- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:57:19 +0100
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Tim,
With reference to:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#timbl-02
The RDFcore working group have considered your comment about changing the
semantics of reification, and subsequent suggestions to remove reification
altogether [2], and has resolved:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0128.html
not to accept this comment. (This response does not address the bagId
question you raised, which is being dealt with in a separate response.)
In our discussions, we noted three significant applications that use
reificiation as currently defined ([1], [5], and also Roland Schwaenzl
(http://www.mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de/staff/phpages/schwaenzlr.html) was
reported to use reification as currently defined). We note and agree that
reification as defined does not address the particular problems you hoped
it would solve [3], but considering that other users of RDF have found it
useful leads us to the conclusion that reification should remain as defined.
We believe that the clarification of reification that you suggest [3] is
provided by the discussion and non-entailment mentioned in the RDF formal
semantics [4].
The working group has agreed to include some additional "health warnings"
on the corresponding semantics and schema descriptions so that folks are
alerted to some uses for which reification is not appropriate.
Can you please respond to <www-rdf-comments@w3.org> indicating whether this
response is satisfactory. Thank you.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0108.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0241.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0477.html
(recorded as issue timbl-02:)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0497.html
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#Reif
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0167.html
#g
-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 04:43:36 UTC