W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: nodeID

From: Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:36:41 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200304021836.UAA20285@scarlett.mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
To: roland@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org


> From Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk Wed Apr  2 19:07 MET 2003
> To: Roland Schwaenzl <roland@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
> cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: nodeID 
> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:04:56 +0100
> From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
> 
> >>>Roland Schwaenzl said:
> > maybe i'm missing something: Is there mentioning  rdf:nodeID is not 
> > supposed to survive parsing at another place than in the syntax and 
> > model document?  
> 
> I'm sorry, I can't understand what you are asking here.  rdf:nodeID
> is an attribute used in the RDF/XML syntax, it doesn't appear in the
> Semantics document or RDF model.

The content of the nodeID attribute....
> 
> > 
> > I would like to see cases -if there are- described in the primer, which 
> > require (!) the use of rdf:ID, rdf:resource and other syntax constructs -
> 
> Sorry again, I don't understand what you are asking about "requiring"
> the use of "syntax constructs".

For example a case in which use of the rdf:ID attribute 
cannot be substituted by any other
RDF/XML syntax construction representing the same graph. 

rs

> 
> Dave
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 13:36:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT