W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: [closed] Re: nodeID

From: Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:08:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200304021908.VAA20398@scarlett.mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
To: roland@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com


> From bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com Wed Apr  2 19:31 MET 2003
> X-Sender: europe1\bwm@localhost
> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:32:14 +0100
> To: Roland Schwaenzl <roland@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>,
>         www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> Subject: [closed] Re: nodeID
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> At 13:01 02/04/2003 +0200, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Roland,
> 
> Are you referring to the model and syntax document
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/

No

> 
> rdf:nodeID is a new feature 

which i like, as i indicated -  it should be stressed a little more
how the VALUES of nodeID might behave during parsing. 


rdf:ID etc: I'm not on technical (!) problems here - 

rs
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 14:08:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT