W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003


From: Roland Schwaenzl <roland@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:01:10 +0200
Message-ID: <3E8AC2F6.3020506@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Dear wg,

maybe i'm missing something: Is there mentioning  rdf:nodeID is not 
supposed to survive parsing at another place than in the syntax and 
model document?  

Isn't it rdf:nodeID's provide a simple hack, which allows to (re)-serialize
RDF  graphs as  rather flat verbose XML (with literal parsetype as 

I would like to see cases -if there are- described in the primer, which 
require (!) the use of rdf:ID, rdf:resource and other syntax constructs -

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 06:01:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:20 UTC