W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: RDF Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:09:51 -0000
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDOEEJCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
That's fine.
Thanks
Brian.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2002 13:09
> To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RDF Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use
>
>
> Jeremy,
>
> In
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jul/0041.html
>
> you raised an issue which was captured in
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
>
> as
>
> [[[
> Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can
> rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a
> property
> attribute etc.
> ]]]
>
> In addition to previous WG decisions as noted in:
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0388.html
>
> as recorded in:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-25-3
>
> the WG has further decided:
>
> [[
> that an RDF processor SHOULD emit a warning when encountering
> names in the
> RDF namespace which are not defined, but should otherwise behave normally.
>
> Specifically:
>
>    <rdf:Description>
>      <rdf:foo>foo</rdf:foo>
>    </rdf:Description>
>
> is equivalent to:
>
> _:a <rdf:foo> "foo" .
>
> and the issue is closed.
> ]]
>
> Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
>
> Brian McBride
> RDFCore co-chair
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:10:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT