Tim, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0172.html you raised an issue which was captured in http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-fragments as [[[ "In the RDF (model/syntax) spec a reference to a subtree of an XML document containing RDF is taken to be a reference to the RDF object." (TimBL) ]]] As recorded in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/ the RDFCore WG has resolved: [[ that RDF uses URI's with fragment ID's to identify resources. This issue is now closed. ]] The WG also raised an action to draft text for the primer on the use of fragment id's with appropriate warnings regarding their semantics and asked Dan Connolly to hightlight this issue with the TAG. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chairReceived on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:15:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:12 GMT