- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:43:01 -0500 (EST)
- To: <tarod@softhome.net>
- cc: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
[sniiiippp.......] Guys, please pick a mailing list and stick to it. This thread isn't interesting enough to merit crossposting to *3* RDF mailing lists. Most threads aren't! The RDF comments list is for formal feedback to W3C on our specifications. Please do try not clutter the archives by crossposting general discusson, as it makes it harder to scan them for explicit items of feedback. The logic list is for [[technical discussion concerning the design of logic-based languages for use on the Web]], and seems in-scope for this topic. see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/ for full list blurb. If you prefer to use the most general RDF/SW mailing list, www-rdf-interest, bear in mind that each post goes to several hundred people. Sometimes discussing things offlist (perhaps cc:'ing www-archive@w3.org, archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/) can work well. I don't want to discourage people from using www-rdf-interest, but it is worth doing what we can to reduce everyone's email burden. Certainly, cross-posting to RDF three lists is excessive. cheers, Dan -- mailto:danbri@w3.org http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 17:43:06 UTC