>From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > >> Yes, but my point is that this logical interpretation is *not* RDF >> entailment. It is, instead, RDFS entailment. > >I still fail to see why it is important for us to classify entailments. >It's just going to over complicate stuff needlessly. If my agent knows the >rules for rdfs:subClass, than it can arrive at legitimate entailments, There is no universal overriding notion of 'legitimate' entailment, is why. I agree it complicates things, but I see no way around the fact that life is complicated. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Thursday, 30 May 2002 15:42:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:13 GMT