W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: need to determine what RDF is

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:52:36 -0700
Message-ID: <00c801c207fa$67546dc0$657ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>

From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

> Yes, but my point is that this logical interpretation is *not* RDF
> entailment.  It is, instead, RDFS entailment.

I still fail to see why it is important for us to classify entailments.
It's just going to over complicate stuff needlessly.  If my agent knows the
rules for rdfs:subClass, than it can arrive at legitimate entailments, if it
doesn't know those rules, then  it can't. Why can't we just agree not to
bother to classify entailments?   What added benefit is gained by
classifying entailments?


Seth Russell
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 12:59:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:18 UTC