W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2002

APPEL rules in RDF

From: Giles Hogben <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:19:14 +0200
Message-ID: <01aa01c1e068$6689c4d0$162abf8b@pcdsa22>
To: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Sorry but I can't understand the syntax used in these docs (e.g. "log:racine
[log:semantics :F]" ).. Any hints?


> On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 09:22, Giles Hogben wrote:
> [...]
> > 2. I couldn't find anywhere the rule that you said you made work - is
that
> > available to have a look at
>
> yes...
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/p3p/p3pAArules.n3
>
> all the raw materials are references, one way or another, from
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/p3p/Makefile
>
> Sorry to be so brief and cryptic; having trouble
> making time for this conversation.
>
> If we're to continue
> this discussion in substance, it'll help me a lot if
> we can copy www-archive@w3.org (or p3p-dev or any
> other relevant public forum) so that I can refer
> to it later.
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/
>
> > 3. How does this work relate to the P3P RDF Schema
>
> This rules stuff was my way of reviewing the P3P RDF Schema.
>
> I mostly followed it, but I think not completely; I tried
> to leave breadcrumbs where I departed.
>
> > - does the RDF it
> > produces validate against it?
>
> Umm... I think so.
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 04:16:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT