W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

RDF Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:48:11 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011220184512.0209ae08@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Jeremy,
In

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jul/0041.html

you raised an issue which was captured in

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use

as

[[[
Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can 
rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a property 
attribute etc.
]]]

As recorded in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0651.html

the RDFCore WG:

   o Resolves that the use of rdf:RDF, rdf:ID, rdf:about,
     rdf:resource, rdf:bagID, rdf:parseType, rdf:aboutEach and rdf:li
     except as reserved names as specified in the grammar is an error.
   o resolves that test case
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf
      be obsoleted
   o resolves that  a copy of that test case be created as an error
     test case

Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.

Brian McBrideRDFCore co-chair
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 13:48:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:30 GMT