- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 21:40:04 +0000
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Jeremy, Reviewing the issue, I realise that the resolution so far does not close the issue, there are other factors, so please consider this a partial resolution. Brian At 18:48 20/12/2001 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >Jeremy, >In > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jul/0041.html > >you raised an issue which was captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use > >as > >[[[ >Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can >rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a property >attribute etc. >]]] > >As recorded in > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0651.html > >the RDFCore WG: > > o Resolves that the use of rdf:RDF, rdf:ID, rdf:about, > rdf:resource, rdf:bagID, rdf:parseType, rdf:aboutEach and rdf:li > except as reserved names as specified in the grammar is an error. > o resolves that test case >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf > be obsoleted > o resolves that a copy of that test case be created as an error > test case > >Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org >indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. > >Brian McBrideRDFCore co-chair
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 05:43:16 UTC