Re: RDF Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use

Jeremy,

Reviewing the issue, I realise that the resolution so far does not close 
the issue, there are other factors, so please consider this a partial 
resolution.

Brian


At 18:48 20/12/2001 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>Jeremy,
>In
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jul/0041.html
>
>you raised an issue which was captured in
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
>
>as
>
>[[[
>Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can 
>rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a property 
>attribute etc.
>]]]
>
>As recorded in
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0651.html
>
>the RDFCore WG:
>
>   o Resolves that the use of rdf:RDF, rdf:ID, rdf:about,
>     rdf:resource, rdf:bagID, rdf:parseType, rdf:aboutEach and rdf:li
>     except as reserved names as specified in the grammar is an error.
>   o resolves that test case
>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf
>      be obsoleted
>   o resolves that  a copy of that test case be created as an error
>     test case
>
>Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
>indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
>
>Brian McBrideRDFCore co-chair