W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: RDF Issue rdfms-qnames-cant-represent-all-uris

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 13:49:10 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105134858.03895670@joy.songbird.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Yes, this is acceptable to me.

#g
--

At 12:50 PM 11/5/01 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>Graham,
>
>In
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Feb/0120.html
>
>you raised an issue with the RDF M&S spec which was captured in
>
> 
>http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qnames-cant-represent-all-uris
>
>as
>
>   The RDF XML syntax uses XML qnames to represent property URI's. However,
>   not all possible property URI's, for example, http://acme.com/property/
>   can be represented in this manner. This is an example of a more general
>   issue, that the RDF XML syntax cannot represent all possible RDF models.
>
>On the 26th October 2001, the RDFCore WG decided
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0582.html
>
>to postpone consideration of this issue until a future WG.
>
>Please could you reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org 
>indicating whether this decision is acceptable.
>
>Brian McBride
>RDFCore co-chair

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 08:53:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:29 GMT