W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: RDF Issue rdfms-qnames-as-attrib-values

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 13:48:30 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011105134805.03894720@joy.songbird.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Yes, this is acceptable to me.

#g
--

At 12:44 PM 11/5/01 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>Graham,
>
>In
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001AprJun/0028.html
>
>you raised an issue with the RDF M&S specification which was recorded in
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qnames-as-attrib-values
>
>as
>
>   Currently, resource identifier values specified in attributes such as
>   "about", "resource", "aboutEach" and "type" are specified as
>   URI-references. The same resources used in element or attribute names
>   are specified as Qnames. Other specifications permit the use of Qnames
>   in attribute values. It would enhance readability of RDF were also to
>   do so.
>
>On 26th October 2001, the RDFCore WG decided to postpone consideration of 
>this issue until a future WG.
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0582.html
>
>Could you please respond, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating 
>whether this decision is acceptable.
>
>Brian McBride
>RDFCore co-chair
>

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 08:53:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:29 GMT