- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:05:43 -0600
- To: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 09:52, Masahide Kanzaki wrote: > Hi Dan, all, > > At 4:43 PM -0600 04.3.10, Dan Connolly wrote: > >This new schema uses strings rather than URIs for enumerated > >values, as proposed 11Feb > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Feb/0010.html > > > > > >These changes are subject to appeal as usual... > > > > "if anyone screams, within a week or so, we'll back out the > > changes (for further discussion)" > > -- http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/#dev > > Since there seems to be no objection to the above change, I modified the > online version of ical2rdf [1] accordingly, to output strings for those > properties (just got rid of @symbolProps and @symbolOrTextProps related > portions. Oh good; neither Libby nor I had much energy for maintaining the perl code. Glad to see you're keeping it in sync. > Looks working ... is this correct ?) Our test data should answer that question, to some level of confidence. Here's the program I run to check whether fromIcal.py is still working after I tweak it: http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/fromIcalTest.py It runs over a dozen or so of the test files and graph-compares the output from fromIcal.py to the expected results. > cheers, > > [1] http://kanzaki.com/courier/ical2rdf -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 11:05:45 UTC