W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > March 2004

Re: ical RDF schema: derived from the RFC, OWL-DL happy, has versionInfo

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:05:43 -0600
To: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
Cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-Id: <1079712343.2465.74.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 09:52, Masahide Kanzaki wrote:
> Hi Dan, all,
> 
> At 4:43 PM -0600 04.3.10, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >This new schema uses strings rather than URIs for enumerated
> >values, as proposed 11Feb
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Feb/0010.html
> >
> >
> >These changes are subject to appeal as usual...
> >
> >  "if anyone screams, within a week or so, we'll back out the
> >  changes (for further discussion)"
> >  -- http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/#dev
> 
> Since there seems to be no objection to the above change, I modified the
> online version of ical2rdf [1] accordingly, to output strings for those
> properties (just got rid of @symbolProps and @symbolOrTextProps related
> portions.

Oh good; neither Libby nor I had much energy for maintaining the perl
code. Glad to see you're keeping it in sync.

>  Looks working ... is this correct ?)

Our test data should answer that question, to some level of confidence.

Here's the program I run to check whether fromIcal.py is still
working after I tweak it:
  http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/fromIcalTest.py

It runs over a dozen or so of the test files and graph-compares
the output from fromIcal.py to the expected results.

> cheers,
> 
> [1] http://kanzaki.com/courier/ical2rdf
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 11:05:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:44 GMT