Re: semantic ical and the spring symposium on semantic web services

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:48, Libby Miller wrote:

[...]
> >
> > Dan, did you reach any conclusions about moving the new vocab to the
> > old namespace?
>
> I don't mean for anybody to refer to the .../rfc2445-formal schema
> from their data!
>
> The new schema has more constraints in it, but there are only a few
> small changes to the way the actual data works (enumerated values
> are strings and Valarm is a component and maybe a couple others).
>
> i.e. the new schema is intended to describe almost the same vocabulary.
> I updated the conversion tools and test data, and I plan to update
> the 2002/12/cal schema itself presently, unless somebody objects.


Thanks for the clarification Dan - are you going with

[[
if anyone screams, within a week or so, we'll back out the changes (for
further discussion)
]]
http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/

?

I think well worth updating.

cheers

Libby