W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > March 2004

Re: semantic ical and the spring symposium on semantic web services

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:39:37 -0500
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Terry Payne <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-Id: <1078310376.2406.37.camel@jammer>

On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 05:23, Libby Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:48, Libby Miller wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > >
> > > Dan, did you reach any conclusions about moving the new vocab to the
> > > old namespace?
> >
> > I don't mean for anybody to refer to the .../rfc2445-formal schema
> > from their data!
> >
> > The new schema has more constraints in it, but there are only a few
> > small changes to the way the actual data works (enumerated values
> > are strings and Valarm is a component and maybe a couple others).
> >
> > i.e. the new schema is intended to describe almost the same vocabulary.
> > I updated the conversion tools and test data, and I plan to update
> > the 2002/12/cal schema itself presently, unless somebody objects.
> 
> 
> Thanks for the clarification Dan - are you going with
> 
> [[
> if anyone screams, within a week or so, we'll back out the changes (for
> further discussion)
> ]]
> http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/
> 
> ?

of course.

> I think well worth updating.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Libby
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2004 05:39:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:44 GMT