W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation?

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 01:29:57 +0200
To: david_marston@us.ibm.com
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <3f6dc6e8.473251129@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote:
>Alex and Bjoern seem to be converging on an understanding that I think
>is intended by SpecGL:
>A spec specifies the behavior of one or more classes of product. That
>is, the class is the conformance subject. Each implementation is one
>instance of the class, and it can be tested for conformance.

Hmm. Various W3C Technical Reports define and/or use the term
"implementation" as opposed to specifications, documents, etc.

>Example: the XSLT spec has one class of product, an XSLT processor. It
>does not define the notion of conformance for a stylesheet editor, a
>validator, or any other product.

Why are stylesheets not a class of product here? Is this considered good
practise? I must admit that I find it odd that the XSLT 1.0 Rec does not
mention stylesheets in its section on conformance or not to consider
XSLT stylesheets a class of product of the XSLT 1.0 Recommendation.

I would appreciate if the Specification Guidelines require that all
requirements of a specification are directly bound to a class of product
(which would consider the conformance section of XSLT 1.0 bad practise).
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2003 19:30:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:00 GMT