W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation?

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 05 Sep 2003 12:04:59 +0200
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: david_marston@us.ibm.com, www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <1062756300.18238.272.camel@stratustier>
Le ven 05/09/2003 ŗ 01:29, Bjoern Hoehrmann a ťcrit :
> I would appreciate if the Specification Guidelines require that all
> requirements of a specification are directly bound to a class of product

I think it already does so:
- CP 2.1 -> " A specification MUST list the classes of product for which
it defines conformance requirements; [...]"
- CP 2.2 -> "The specification MUST define the conformance requirements
for each class of product identified in checkpoint 2.1."

(in the WG version,
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/08/qaframe-spec#Gd-identify-what-conform)

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 06:05:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:00 GMT