W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > August 2002

Good behaviour Re: conformance vs. compliance

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:28:06 -0400
Message-Id: <a05111b0ab97d8413a0dc@[24.201.26.36]>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, <www-qa@w3.org>

At 10:42 -0600 2002-08-09, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>And, perhaps, add a checkpoint discouraging marketing of conformant
>implementations so that "conformance" does not get abused in a few
>years?
>
>	Bad marketing folks SHOULD use "Compliant with W3C
>	standards" terminology, while the good people should use
>	"Conformant with W3C recommendations". [Priority3]

Alex, just a simple reminder, the list is here to exchange ideas and 
work together, it's not the place for flame, irony, or rants.

Good behaviour topic closed.
Thanks.
-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 11:37:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT