At 10:42 -0600 2002-08-09, Alex Rousskov wrote: >And, perhaps, add a checkpoint discouraging marketing of conformant >implementations so that "conformance" does not get abused in a few >years? > > Bad marketing folks SHOULD use "Compliant with W3C > standards" terminology, while the good people should use > "Conformant with W3C recommendations". [Priority3] Alex, just a simple reminder, the list is here to exchange ideas and work together, it's not the place for flame, irony, or rants. Good behaviour topic closed. Thanks. -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 11:37:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT