- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 16:19:51 -0400
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: David Marston <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Message-Id: <C2EB2A3A-72C5-49DB-837A-1D601760A862@w3.org>
Hi Dave, QA WG,
There is still work to do on "Variability in Specification"[1] .
Three sections need to be created or polished.
* "4.2 Specification Umbrella"[2]
The section has been completed last week before the publication.
But I guess it deserves more work with more examples, illustration
the issues.
Potential Contributors: Dave, Dom, Karl, Lynne
* "Specification category"[3]
ISSUE: needs to explain the different categories, how to actually
make a specification category analysis
[[[
"Specification Category" -- this is under-specified. I.e., it is
difficult to understand both the explanations of the different
categories (they each need at least a sentence of definition/
discussion), and how this is critical to variability analysis. I
myself would have difficulty writing a Spec. Cat. analysis based on
this. We should develop the section better, or remove it. For now,
maybe "green flag" it to indicate that we think it needs attention.
]]] - Specification categories unspecified - Lofton Henderson [4]
*"6. Optional features"[5]
ISSUE: needs to address discretionary items, and more largely, the
remaining DoV.
[[[
I think WCAG should be the primary example for functional levels,
with DOM and/or CSS as secondary examples.
I think there should be some mention of Discretionary Items, such as
the treatment that Mark mailed in, so that you can then say that
modules are not the same. A module is a larger functional package,
and the variability question for an implementer is whether to
implement or not. A discretionary item is a decision point where the
implementer chooses how to deal with a situation which they must
address.
]]] - Address discretionary items - Dave Marston [6]
Dom replied
[[[
I agree with you that there should be something about discretionary
items in this document; however it won't make it for this
publication; I've flagged an issue on this in the document; more
largely, I think we should address the theoretical aspects of each
DoV in it.
]]] - theoritical aspects of *each* DOV - Dom [7]
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/#umbrella
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/#spec-cat
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0127.html
[5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/#optionality
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/att-0120/00-
part
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0132.html
--
Karl
Received on Monday, 2 May 2005 21:41:23 UTC