Le samedi 12 mars 2005 à 16:52 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit : > (I took the action item to rewrite this last week.) > 2.3 Good Practice B: > > The specification should provide sufficient detail in the > normative references to prevent conflicting interpretations of the > requirements imposed by reference. This is too long for the good practice part; what about "Provide details about normative references" or something along that? (the rest of the proposal sounds good to me) -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Monday, 14 March 2005 10:19:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT