W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Issue 1144 regarding SpecGL 2.3

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:19:16 +0100
To: david_marston@us.ibm.com
Cc: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1110795556.11665.474.camel@stratustier>
Le samedi 12 mars 2005 ŗ 16:52 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com a ťcrit :
> (I took the action item to rewrite this last week.) 
> 2.3 Good Practice B: 
> 
>         The specification should provide sufficient detail in the
> normative references to prevent conflicting interpretations of the
> requirements imposed by reference. 

This is too long for the good practice part; what about 
"Provide details about normative references" or something along that?

(the rest of the proposal sounds good to me)
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 10:19:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT