- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:09:14 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, david_marston@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
At 11:19 AM 3/14/2005 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Le samedi 12 mars 2005 à 16:52 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit : > > (I took the action item to rewrite this last week.) > > 2.3 Good Practice B: > > > > The specification should provide sufficient detail in the > > normative references to prevent conflicting interpretations of the > > requirements imposed by reference. > >This is too long for the good practice part; what about >"Provide details about normative references" or something along that? Or "Provide detailed normative references.", and then explain "detailed" in "What means".
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 15:09:31 UTC