W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Issue 1144 regarding SpecGL 2.3

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:09:14 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050314080817.0429e238@localhost>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, david_marston@us.ibm.com
Cc: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

At 11:19 AM 3/14/2005 +0100, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le samedi 12 mars 2005 ŗ 16:52 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com a ťcrit :
> > (I took the action item to rewrite this last week.)
> > 2.3 Good Practice B:
> >
> >         The specification should provide sufficient detail in the
> > normative references to prevent conflicting interpretations of the
> > requirements imposed by reference.
>
>This is too long for the good practice part; what about
>"Provide details about normative references" or something along that?

Or "Provide detailed normative references.", and then explain "detailed" in 
"What means".
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 15:09:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT