Re: Issue 1144 regarding SpecGL 2.3

At 11:19 AM 3/14/2005 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>Le samedi 12 mars 2005 à 16:52 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit :
> > (I took the action item to rewrite this last week.)
> > 2.3 Good Practice B:
> >
> >         The specification should provide sufficient detail in the
> > normative references to prevent conflicting interpretations of the
> > requirements imposed by reference.
>
>This is too long for the good practice part; what about
>"Provide details about normative references" or something along that?

Or "Provide detailed normative references.", and then explain "detailed" in 
"What means".