W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2005

1.0?

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:09:09 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20050729110529.0365e908@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org


The cover page of PR SpecGL 1.0,
http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ ,
is interesting in that it doesn't contain a version number.

While we don't anticipate a 1.1 or 2.0 soon, and as I recall pubrules 
doesn't require it (but suggests it), it seems pretty common amongst W3C 
Recommendations.

Should Rec SpecGL have a major version number?

-Lofton.

Received on Friday, 29 July 2005 17:09:11 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lofton Henderson: "progressing CC template"
Previous message: Dimitris Dimitriadis: "F2F regrets"
Next in thread: Karl Dubost: "Re: 1.0?"
Reply: Karl Dubost: "Re: 1.0?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 29 July 2005 17:09:11 GMT