W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2005

Re: 1.0?

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:48 -0400
Message-Id: <0E4E9FC5-2036-4163-906E-D66873CB801A@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>


Le 05-07-29 à 13:09, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> The cover page of PR SpecGL 1.0,
> http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ ,
> is interesting in that it doesn't contain a version number.
>
> While we don't anticipate a 1.1 or 2.0 soon, and as I recall  
> pubrules doesn't require it (but suggests it), it seems pretty  
> common amongst W3C Recommendations.
>
> Should Rec SpecGL have a major version number?

That was a question I raised at a meeting (I can't find the  
discussion). We never reached consensus on that one.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 29 July 2005 20:23:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 29 July 2005 20:23:51 GMT