W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2005

[draft] Agenda: Feb 07 2005 QA WG teleconf

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:28:43 -0500
Message-Id: <8962bc6cde8e7ffef6c2d6733c09e53c@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
QAWG telecon participants --

   Here is the final agenda for today teleconf.

The principal topic will be SpecGL LC issues resolution; issues list:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi? 
query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=Q 
A&content=

Agenda
   =====
   Scribe: Dom, Lofton,
   Chair: Karl
   Template: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/telcon-template.txt


1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership

2.) routine business
* Technical Plenary: Extension and Versioning Panel
	Need someone from QA on the Panel.
* WCAG 2.0 issues
	How to answer to their requests wrt to implementation of SpecGL inside  
WCAG 2.0
* xml:id Specification
	thanks dave for your analysis
	They modified their specification to address all our points.
	xml:id seems to be the first SpecGL conformant specification.

3.) SpecGL issues
Dom's analysis:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Jan/0074

#1052 "Classes of product" unclear and dangerous
	Ongoing: RK: Proposal for Classes of Products.
#1041 Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS)
	Ongoing: Lofton will modify the wording before Feb 11
#1045 Avoiding device-dependent profiles
	Ongoing: Karl asks more information about it to Ian Hickson
#1047 Addition to error mechanism
	Ongoing: Karl to write something about it
#1048 Additions to "write tests"
	Ongoing: Karl to write something to clarify
#1049 Formal vs prose language normativity
	Ongoing: Karl to write a good practice about it.
#1050 Modesty requirement


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi? 
query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=Q 
A&content=

Editorial(?):
* Structure/Numbering confusing
* Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati...
* Comment about HTML spec examples needs refinement
* Case of RFC2119 terms
* Correction to example about CSS extensibility
* "Identify depreacted features" too strong
* GF: removing the section about Umbrella Specification
* GF: wording of the conformance section
* GF: inconsistent numbering (duplicate)
* GF: specification definition
* JC: Editorial comments

GF: stands for Gary Feldman
JC: stands for Jeremy Carroll


   Logistics
   =====
   Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
   11:00am-12noon EST.
   code: 7294 ("QAWG")
   IRC, see: http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:53:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:19 GMT