W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:08:34 +0200
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1113988114.24580.82.camel@stratustier>
Le mardi 19 avril 2005 ŗ 14:19 -0400, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
> I need an answer on that to be able to draft an answer to the TAG. The 
> prose comes from the BjŲrn HŲrhmann's mail.
> 	http://www.w3.org/mid/41aa64e7.1905102963@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de

I can't find the said prose in BjŲrn's message... 

> Original Text:
> 	"Contradictory choices and references: Using the concept of 
> URI-reference as a normative reference and then in the prose of the 
> specification, define that it is an error to use it."
> 
> Proposed Text:
> 	"Contradictory choices and references: A WG might decide to use the 
> concept of URI-reference as normative for a feature and then later in 
> the prose of the specification, define that it is an error to use it."

I still can't make sense of the new text... One possible solution (if
nobody understands the intent) is to drop it altogether.

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org


Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 09:08:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT