Le mardi 19 avril 2005 à 14:19 -0400, Karl Dubost a écrit : > I need an answer on that to be able to draft an answer to the TAG. The > prose comes from the Björn Hörhmann's mail. > http://www.w3.org/mid/41aa64e7.1905102963@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de I can't find the said prose in Björn's message... > Original Text: > "Contradictory choices and references: Using the concept of > URI-reference as a normative reference and then in the prose of the > specification, define that it is an error to use it." > > Proposed Text: > "Contradictory choices and references: A WG might decide to use the > concept of URI-reference as normative for a feature and then later in > the prose of the specification, define that it is an error to use it." I still can't make sense of the new text... One possible solution (if nobody understands the intent) is to drop it altogether. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Wednesday, 20 April 2005 09:08:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT