W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2005

ISSUE 1148 - Text difficult to understand in the example

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:19:20 -0400
Message-Id: <5c5c5d8498cdc0c7b888a848ea1545b6@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Hi QA WG,
I need an answer on that to be able to draft an answer to the TAG. The 
prose comes from the BjŲrn HŲrhmann's mail.
	http://www.w3.org/mid/41aa64e7.1905102963@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de


TAG Original comment:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0003.html

Part of the example of Good Practice 08
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2005/02/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-ex

Original Text:
	"Contradictory choices and references: Using the concept of 
URI-reference as a normative reference and then in the prose of the 
specification, define that it is an error to use it."

Proposed Text:
	"Contradictory choices and references: A WG might decide to use the 
concept of URI-reference as normative for a feature and then later in 
the prose of the specification, define that it is an error to use it."

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2005 19:21:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:20 GMT