- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:49:22 -0400
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Fine with me. At 03:31 PM 10/13/2004, Karl Dubost wrote: >As Lynne has noticed it, we don't use RFC 2119 keywords in our conformance >clause, but in the Conformance clause. > >Le 04 oct. 2004, à 19:45, Lynne Rosenthal a écrit : >>4. The keywords, MUST, MUST NOT, etc. We don’t actually use these in our >>document. Do we still need to include this statement? >> >>The last sentence, “Occurrences of these words in lowercase… with no >>normative implications” is NOT true. Our Conformance Clause uses ‘must’ >>and has a normative implication. > >Would it be acceptable to include those in the Conformance section? > >Proposed Text: >""" >The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", >"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY ", and "OPTIONAL" are used as >defined in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] in this conformance clause. Occurrences of >these words in lowercase has normative implications. >""" > > > >-- >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >W3C Conformance Manager >*** Be Strict To Be Cool *** >
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 12:49:28 UTC