W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2004

[closed] Re: [ISSUE] Use of RFC 2119 keywords only for the Conformance Clause

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:00:20 -0400
Message-Id: <4B9A92C6-1E13-11D9-8C47-000A95718F82@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Conformance Keywords have been added to

See Editor's Draft:
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2004/10/WD-qaframe-spec/#conformance [Member 
Only]

Le 13 oct. 2004, à 15:31, Karl Dubost a écrit :
> Would it be acceptable to include those in the Conformance section?
>
> Proposed Text:
> """
> The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
> "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY ", and "OPTIONAL" are used 
> as defined in RFC 2119 [RFC2119] in this conformance clause. 
> Occurrences of these words in lowercase has normative implications.
> """




-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 22:11:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT