- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0600
- To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 05:34 PM 6/7/2004 +0300, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote: >[...] >added status to all principle issues in the end of the document >(anticipating serious restrucuting since I propose that most principle be >put in QAH, leaving test suite specific ones in TestGL. This is contrary to what we agreed before [1], and I strongly oppose it. Before we decided: 1.) TestGL talks in a bit of detail about test-related process principles/practices, in non-normative way in a section at the end of TestGL. 2.) lightweight reference to #1 from QAH. That decision is implemented now in QAH, [2] and [3]. IMO, we MUST stop fiddling with previous decisions unless there's a compelling reason to revisit them, especially when they start impacting other parts of QAF (like the published QAH). For convenience, here is the relevant bit from [1]: >3. Day-day operations >LH: This is where most of the stuff goes. The QAPD addressed most of the >checkpoints in OpsGL. We agreed that some of the test related checkpoints >would migrate to TestLite. I preserved most of the checkpoints associated >with QAPD. Some of them are purely operational, e.g., communications, >contact; whereas some were about test development framework and >maintenance. Think it wouldn't be bad to mention and include here, but >point to TestLite for details. >PC: Reasonable, as long as we avoid duplication. >[...] Regards, -Lofton. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Apr/0010.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qa-handbook-20040510/#Test [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qa-handbook-20040510/#Life
Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 12:31:02 UTC