W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: SpecGL Use Cases

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 29 Jul 2003 10:59:22 +0200
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1059469164.5322.47.camel@stratustier>
Le lun 28/07/2003 ŗ 19:26, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> At 06:23 PM 6/20/03 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
> >[...]
> > >  ∑       a Working Group has committed in its charter to a level AA
> > > conformance to the Specification Guidelines for its specifications (as
> > > required for AA conformance to the Operational Guidelines, for instance) ;
> 
> The "(as required...)" is inaccurate.  OpsGL AA conformance doesn't require 
> SpecGL AA conformance.  Rather, OpsGL CP1.1 (as revised) requires that the 
> WG make a SpecGL conformance commitment (of A, or AA, or AAA).  This is a 
> priority 1 CP.  Therefore it relates to OpsGL A conformance.
> 
> This would be accurate:
> 
> "* a Working Group has committed in its charter to conform to the 
> Specification Guidelines for its specifications (as required for A 
> conformance to the Operational Guidelines, for instance), and has picked 
> the level AA conformance level."

Good catch, I have fixed the use case in the editor's version of SpecGL.

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 04:59:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT