- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:44:52 -0700
- To: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org, ab@w3.org
At 02:38 PM 2/4/03 -0500, Joseph Reagle wrote: >On Tuesday 04 February 2003 13:24, Lofton Henderson wrote: > > The QAWG tried to find an > > acceptable middle ground -- somewhere between elevating TM license to the > > highly visible W3C level of Software License and Document License, on the > > one hand, and saying nothing to the concerns of potential contributors > > like MS, on the other. It seems that we may have missed the mark. > >I don't think it's a matter of "visibility" or middle ground, once we have a >robust understanding of the requirements a W3C Test License might be >appropriate course of action. Actually, it was my view that the "middle ground" was a stopgap -- and thought to be uncontroversial -- for the Last Call publication, while we continued to sort out the requirement for and advisability of a Test Materials License. > > Any case, it would be easier to finally sort out face-to-face, IMO. > >This sounds like a good idea, I have no other scheduled activity on the >Thur/Fri of that plenary week. However, I hope we can continue the >discussion prior to then. Agreed. -Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 17:42:07 UTC