- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:38:09 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org, ab@w3.org
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 13:24, Lofton Henderson wrote: > The QAWG tried to find an > acceptable middle ground -- somewhere between elevating TM license to the > highly visible W3C level of Software License and Document License, on the > one hand, and saying nothing to the concerns of potential contributors > like MS, on the other. It seems that we may have missed the mark. I don't think it's a matter of "visibility" or middle ground, once we have a robust understanding of the requirements a W3C Test License might be appropriate course of action. > Any case, it would be easier to finally sort out face-to-face, IMO. This sounds like a good idea, I have no other scheduled activity on the Thur/Fri of that plenary week. However, I hope we can continue the discussion prior to then.
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 14:38:19 UTC