W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: issue #99

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:16:49 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021017101406.0448cb20@rockynet.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 03:44 PM 10/17/02 +0900, Karl Dubost wrote:

>Lofton,
>
>At 10:07 -0600 2002-10-14, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>1.)  It should not be closed until we discuss issue #19 and consider the 
>>request to reverse that issue's resolution.
>>
>>2.) I *do not* want it removed or matched to the one in QA Glossary. 
>>(Note that it points to the one in the QA Glossary, and supplements or 
>>builds on it -- or at least that was the intention, in line with the 
>>constraints in the pre-Tokyo issue #19 disposition.)
>
>You have just forgotten there's a pending action item and that's my fault 
>about the glossary that should solve your concerns.

Well, not really.  See explanation in earlier message about issue #19.


>1. The QA Glossary will be a dated version file.
>So the specification can refer to a stable and specific version of the 
>glossary.

The key issue is not that -- stable dated version.  It is the remaining 
open bit of issue #19.

-Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 12:16:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT