W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: issue #99

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:44:13 +0900
Message-Id: <a05111b10b9d40c5bc1a3@[10.0.2.4]>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Lofton,

At 10:07 -0600 2002-10-14, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>1.)  It should not be closed until we discuss issue #19 and consider 
>the request to reverse that issue's resolution.
>
>2.) I *do not* want it removed or matched to the one in QA Glossary. 
>(Note that it points to the one in the QA Glossary, and supplements 
>or builds on it -- or at least that was the intention, in line with 
>the constraints in the pre-Tokyo issue #19 disposition.)

You have just forgotten there's a pending action item and that's my 
fault about the glossary that should solve your concerns.

1. The QA Glossary will be a dated version file.
So the specification can refer to a stable and specific version of 
the glossary.



-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 02:48:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT