W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: some minutes for october telcons not announced to www-qa

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 09:25:10 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021106092234.041930b0@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 04:18 PM 11/6/02 +0000, Andrew Thackrah wrote:
>[...]
>ps. Lofton - Olivier will hate me for suggesting this but it would make
>  more sense for the person who does step 3 (linking to /Agenda) to
>  also do step 4 (email)

Either this or the following alternative is a good idea, as it avoids 
having to coordinate a final minuter-Oliver-minuter cycle.

>  One alternative would be to point IG (by email) to the www-qa-wg URL and
>  also mention that it will (later) be archived on the /Agenda page.
>  This may be prefereable to putting the burden on Olivier and would mean
>  that IG get an email that links some minutes rather than just a promise 
> of them

Right, this is what I suggested below (perhaps somewhat unclearly).

-Lofton


>On 2002.11.06 14:10 Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>At 10:30 AM 11/6/2002 +0000, Andrew Thackrah wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Olivier,
>>>  I haven't posted minutes (for 16-Oct) to IG yet because the link
>>>  was not available on the Agenda page.
>>>  (I'm following logistics):
>>>  >> QA Web site team enters link from ../QA/Agenda to the minutes message
>>>  >> in www-qa-wg email archive.
>>>  >> Scribe sends simple email announcement to IG (www-qa@w3.org),
>>>  >> saying that minutes are available on the Web page ../QA/WG,
>>Hmmm, good catch.  It goes on to say...
>>------
>>Subject: Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference YYYY-MM-DD
>>The minutes for the teleconference of the QA working group held on
>>[date] can now be found at:
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/[url]
>>Discussion and comments are welcome, on this list.
>>A link to those minutes, along with links to minutes and agenda of other
>>meetings can be found in the QA calendar at :
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/Agenda/
>>------
>>Maybe we ought to say "will be available at".  Otherwise, we have to, in 
>>strict order:
>>(AT) circulate draft to WG
>>(AT) circulate final to WG
>>(OT) update web page
>>(AT) circulate notice to IG
>>It would be nice if AT (or whatever minuter) could do step 2 and 4 at the 
>>same time and be done with it.
>>-Lofton.
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 11:24:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT