W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: some minutes for october telcons not announced to www-qa

From: Andrew Thackrah <andrew@opengroup.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:18:50 +0000
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Cc: ot@w3.org
Message-ID: <20021106161850.C28109@hyperion>


  Hi Olivier,  The URL for the 16-October QAWG final minutes is

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Oct/0140.html

  please could you link this to /Agenda - then I'll pop the email to IG

  cheers,
  -Andrew

ps. Lofton - Olivier will hate me for suggesting this but it would make
  more sense for the person who does step 3 (linking to /Agenda) to
  also do step 4 (email)

  One alternative would be to point IG (by email) to the www-qa-wg URL and
  also mention that it will (later) be archived on the /Agenda page.
  This may be prefereable to putting the burden on Olivier and would mean
  that IG get an email that links some minutes rather than just a promise 
of them


On 2002.11.06 14:10 Lofton Henderson wrote:
> At 10:30 AM 11/6/2002 +0000, Andrew Thackrah wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hi Olivier,
>>  I haven't posted minutes (for 16-Oct) to IG yet because the link
>>  was not available on the Agenda page.
>> 
>>  (I'm following logistics):
>>  >> QA Web site team enters link from ../QA/Agenda to the minutes 
>> message
>>  >> in www-qa-wg email archive.
>> 
>>  >> Scribe sends simple email announcement to IG (www-qa@w3.org),
>>  >> saying that minutes are available on the Web page ../QA/WG,
> 
> Hmmm, good catch.  It goes on to say...
> ------
> Subject: Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference YYYY-MM-DD
> 
> The minutes for the teleconference of the QA working group held on
> [date] can now be found at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/[url]
> 
> Discussion and comments are welcome, on this list.
> 
> A link to those minutes, along with links to minutes and agenda of other
> meetings can be found in the QA calendar at :
> http://www.w3.org/QA/Agenda/
> ------
> 
> Maybe we ought to say "will be available at".  Otherwise, we have to, in 
> strict order:
> 
> (AT) circulate draft to WG
> (AT) circulate final to WG
> (OT) update web page
> (AT) circulate notice to IG
> 
> It would be nice if AT (or whatever minuter) could do step 2 and 4 at 
> the same time and be done with it.
> 
> -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 11:19:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT