W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: [weekinqa] summary of topics on www-qa@w3.org, 13-26 may 2002

From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 05:36:05 +0900
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020529203605.GA8379@w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

On Wed, May 29, 2002, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Hi Olivier,

Hi,
 
> Thanks for this, our first "Week in QA"!

Welcome. I hope the format is OK, if not, please tell me (us) so that we
can improve it for next issues.
 
> I have a question.  I think we may have discussed it at Mandelieu, so 
> please excuse if I've forgotten.  Probably the most intense thread during 
> this period was:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002May/thread.html#0,
> 
> "Testable Assertion Tagging".  Is it not included because the start date 
> preceded the beginning of the two-week period?

In fact, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002May/ tells us
that during the 13-26 may period, there was only one message in this
thread (yours). Most of the discussion has taken place before may 11th
and after may 27th. I, therefore, didn't include the topic for the 13-26
may period.

> Did we discuss/decide how to handle topics that bridge periods?

I think we discussed that, and we decided to note when threads were
"continued" from a previous period (with a link to previousperiod#topic)
Whether the summary should then be a summary of the discussion during
the period or a summary of the whole thread is, well, a good question.


Olivier
-- 
Olivier Thereaux - W3C
http://www.w3.org/People/olivier | http://yoda.zoy.org
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 16:39:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT