comment inlined [...] > 8.) Other possible concurrent QAWG activities > - W3C Project Review (Daniel?) > - proactive charter/ops review? (per WD OpsGuide) > - proactive spec review? (per WD SpecGuide) > - "Test" activities? (other than Frm:Test parts?) > [dd] Is the "test activities" the thread I raised on the necessity to look into forming a separate Test Group (WG or Task Force)? If so, good, otherwise, please add it to the agenda. > [...]Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 13:45:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT