W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: fall meeting

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 07:03:18 -0400
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20020509065914.00ad25e0@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
October 6/7 would be good.  For the March tech plenary, I suggest a meeting 
over 2 days.  At the last tech plenary, 1 day wasn't enough time.

lynne


At 02:16 PM 5/8/02, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>QAWG participants --
>
>We have had some preliminary discussion at the AC meeting about the next 
>f2f after Montreal.  We are thinking Japan/Pacific in early October.  One 
>option would be Tokyo in early October.  To avoid known conflicts, it 
>would look like Mon-Tues, 6/7 October would be best.
>
>For perspective, we are looking at this approximate long-term schedule:
>
>Sept-Oct:  next Frm publication (at least FPWD of all parts?)
>Oct:  meeting
>Jan:  meeting and Last Call publication for all Frm parts.
>March tech plenary:  1-day QAWG meeting; outreach/education/liaison about 
>Framework.
>
>What are your thoughts on the proposed next meeting?
>
>-Lofton.
>
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2002 06:57:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT