Re: fall meeting

October 6/7 would be good.  For the March tech plenary, I suggest a meeting 
over 2 days.  At the last tech plenary, 1 day wasn't enough time.

lynne


At 02:16 PM 5/8/02, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>QAWG participants --
>
>We have had some preliminary discussion at the AC meeting about the next 
>f2f after Montreal.  We are thinking Japan/Pacific in early October.  One 
>option would be Tokyo in early October.  To avoid known conflicts, it 
>would look like Mon-Tues, 6/7 October would be best.
>
>For perspective, we are looking at this approximate long-term schedule:
>
>Sept-Oct:  next Frm publication (at least FPWD of all parts?)
>Oct:  meeting
>Jan:  meeting and Last Call publication for all Frm parts.
>March tech plenary:  1-day QAWG meeting; outreach/education/liaison about 
>Framework.
>
>What are your thoughts on the proposed next meeting?
>
>-Lofton.
>