W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: name change

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 15:55:13 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: danield@w3.org
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 08:31 AM 3/4/02 +0100, you wrote:

>I prefer Operational Guidelines over Operations.

I also think "Operational" is the better of those two.

>I also prefer Process Guidelines over Operational but I'll go with the
>flow on this.

I don't have any strong preference, other than to simplify it.

Does anyone know ... is there any problem with changing shortname?  Now it 
is qaframe-ops.  Qaframe-proc would fit better, if title were "Process 
Guidelines".  I don't know if there are any rules or conventions about how 
accurate shortname should be, and if it can change early in WD 
cycle.  (There is a "Note:" in pubrules [1], but I don't exactly understand 
its implications.)


[1] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 17:53:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:26 UTC