- From: lynne rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 17:39:54 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I prefer Operational Guidelines, but don't have a strong commitment to it. lynne At 03:46 PM 3/2/2002, you wrote: >Hello QAWG -- > >Thanks to all for a productive and successful meeting. > >I wanted to ask about one detail of yesterday's meeting. There was a >rapid exchange in which several people confirmed that they agreed with >changing the name "Process & Operational Guidelines" to "Operations >Guidelines". But I'm not sure that everyone was paying attention, and I >don't think we have considered potential downside(s). > >The only real downside that I see is this: we have started to generate >publicity about "P&O", and have published "P&O" in /TR/. Changing the >name now could create confusion amongst those who aren't paying close >attention. > >What do you think? > >-Lofton. >
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 17:40:19 UTC