W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: name change

From: lynne rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 17:39:54 -0500
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20020304173849.00acc9d0@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I prefer Operational Guidelines, but don't have a strong commitment to it.

lynne


At 03:46 PM 3/2/2002, you wrote:
>Hello QAWG --
>
>Thanks to all for a productive and successful meeting.
>
>I wanted to ask about one detail of yesterday's meeting.  There was a 
>rapid exchange in which several people confirmed that they agreed with 
>changing the name "Process & Operational Guidelines" to "Operations 
>Guidelines".  But I'm not sure that everyone was paying attention, and I 
>don't think we have considered potential downside(s).
>
>The only real downside that I see is this:  we have started to generate 
>publicity about "P&O", and have published "P&O" in /TR/.  Changing the 
>name now could create confusion amongst those who aren't paying close 
>attention.
>
>What do you think?
>
>-Lofton.
>
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 17:40:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT