W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: name change

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 08:31:55 +0100
Message-Id: <200203040731.g247VtS31668@zidane.inria.fr>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

I prefer Operational Guidelines over Operations.
I also prefer Process Guidelines over Operational but I'll go with the 
flow on this.


> Hello QAWG --
> 
> Thanks to all for a productive and successful meeting.
> 
> I wanted to ask about one detail of yesterday's meeting.  There was a rapid 
> exchange in which several people confirmed that they agreed with changing 
> the name "Process & Operational Guidelines" to "Operations 
> Guidelines".  But I'm not sure that everyone was paying attention, and I 
> don't think we have considered potential downside(s).
> 
> The only real downside that I see is this:  we have started to generate 
> publicity about "P&O", and have published "P&O" in /TR/.  Changing the name 
> now could create confusion amongst those who aren't paying close attention.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 02:32:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT