- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 08:31:55 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I prefer Operational Guidelines over Operations. I also prefer Process Guidelines over Operational but I'll go with the flow on this. > Hello QAWG -- > > Thanks to all for a productive and successful meeting. > > I wanted to ask about one detail of yesterday's meeting. There was a rapid > exchange in which several people confirmed that they agreed with changing > the name "Process & Operational Guidelines" to "Operations > Guidelines". But I'm not sure that everyone was paying attention, and I > don't think we have considered potential downside(s). > > The only real downside that I see is this: we have started to generate > publicity about "P&O", and have published "P&O" in /TR/. Changing the name > now could create confusion amongst those who aren't paying close attention. > > What do you think? > > -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 02:32:12 UTC