W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Fwd: Re: TAG issues during technical plenary

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:47:34 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

I forgot to copy QAWG on this...

>Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:18:12 -0500 (EST)
>Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 08:15:36 -0700
>From: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
>To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>,
>         "David Orchard" <david.orchard@bea.com>
>Cc: chairs@w3.org, tag@w3.org
>X-Sender: lofton@rockynet.com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
>Subject: Re: TAG issues during technical plenary
>Resent-From: chairs@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <chairs@w3.org> archive/latest/1752
>X-Loop: chairs@w3.org
>Sender: chairs-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: chairs-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <chairs.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:chairs-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>Let's add QA to Charles' list.  We have queued an issue in the QAWG, to 
>sort out our relationship with TAG (as well as other groups and teams).
>At 08:14 AM 1/22/2002 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>>a brief overview of where the TAG fits in the life of a working group, and
>>how it relates to other horizontal review groups (i18n, WAI PF, DI?, etc)
>>would be valuable - both for clarifying that and for clarifying where those
>>other groups come from and why they loom so large when a last call draft is
>>sent around.
>>Charles McCN
>>On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, David Orchard wrote:
>>   Dear chairs,
>>   The TAG requests your assistance in two matters.  Firstly, the TAG 
>> solicits
>>   your input on topics that the TAG should address.  The TAG has the charter
>>   to publish recommendations on issues.  We believe in surveying a wide
>>   spectrum of parties for issues to address, and your help would be
>>   appreciated.  Secondly, some members of the TAG also believe that the TAG
>>   should provide artifacts/documents that provide context for 
>> Recommendations.
>>   One example of the context is an architecture document with various 
>> text and
>>   diagrams.  The TAG solicits your input on what forms of context would be
>>   useful to you.
>>   The technical plenary agenda [1] has a portion of time for the TAG.  We
>>   would like to present information on our documentation deliverables and
>>   issues list during the session, so your feedback sufficiently before then
>>   would be much appreciated.
>>   Cheers,
>>   Dave Orchard
>>   [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/Plenary/Agenda.html
>>Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 
>>409 134 136
>>W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 
>>258 5999
>>Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
>>(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, 
>Lofton Henderson
>1919 Fourteenth St., #604
>Boulder, CO   80302
>Phone:  303-449-8728
>Email:  lofton@rockynet.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 10:47:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:25 UTC