W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Action Items review

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:38:49 +0100
Message-Id: <200201171338.g0HDcnA30866@zidane.inria.fr>
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Those two are done:

   A-2002-01-03-3  DD   Write an email about the model of the documents.
        is Guidelines-and-checkpoints appropriate for the QAFW

See 
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Jan/0011.html


   A-2002-01-03-4  DD   Ask to Ian for details on the process." (Note
                    versus WD  versus ...)

See
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Jan/0010.html

  
For this one
   A-2001-11-12-3  Karl, Daniel  QA glossary and taxonomy
      Pending

I'd like to reassign Karl/Olivier to it, since I know Olivier has been 
doing some work in the area. 

For this one:
  
  A-2001-11-13-17 Lynne, Daniel  certification paper
        Pending, sent to Daniel to  progress
   http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/01/Note-qa-certif-20020102.html

I think the action for the QAWG is to decide what relations this doc
bares to the QA Framework and if this doc should be discussed in IG
alone for now (so close it there, and add a pointer to it from the QAF)
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 08:38:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT