W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process

From: Daniel J. Weitzner <djweitzner@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 10:33:24 -0400
Message-ID: <00d701c154bd$2e7d24b0$b07ba8c0@bayt>
To: "Jason Antony" <s1118355@student.gu.edu.au>, <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Antony" <s1118355@student.gu.edu.au>
To: <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process


>
> Daniel J. Weitzner wrote:
>
> > So, please stay tuned. I look forward to your comments on the next
> > draft of the policy.
>
> Most certainly. I look forward to the next draft which will hopefully
> address the issues raised here. And your reply has given me hope. The
> actions outlined within are precise and remedy some outstanding flaws in
> the PP WG process. Why not adapt the same approach to the next WD? :-)

I'm not sure I understand how you think that should work, but here's my
response to what I think you mean:

The next time we put out a Last Call draft it will contain (either in the
draft or in an issues list) specific responses to the specific issues raised
in both public and Member comments. And, once we receive comments on that
2nd Last Call draft, we'll do the same again in the next iteration. (Keep in
mind we may put out interim working drafts that address some but not all of
the open issues.

Am I understanding you point? If not, please clarify.

>
> Looking forward to hearing from you on Slashdot.
>
Me too. I'm writing my answers now.

Best,

Danny
Received on Sunday, 14 October 2001 10:30:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:13:42 GMT