W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
>
October 2001
www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from October 2001 by thread
1684 messages
:
Starting
Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00:22 GMT,
Ending
Wednesday, 31 October 2001 16:07:28 GMT
sort by
: [ thread ] [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Amplie suas vendas
111netcon@ieg.com.br
(Wednesday, 31 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
comercial
(Wednesday, 31 October)
Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Dave Reeve
(Thursday, 4 October)
Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
WINTER,CHRIS (HP-Sweden,ex1)
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Daniel Phillips
(Friday, 5 October)
OT: IETF [was: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>]
Jason Antony
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
cb105
(Friday, 26 October)
Choose 3 Free Lipsticks Offer - While Supplies Last
Shop@Manna
(Wednesday, 31 October)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-patent-policy-20010816/
Bob Dewey
(Wednesday, 31 October)
cool link
rixo@mail.de
(Tuesday, 30 October)
21世紀超勁爆生涯講座
taipei7@yam.com
(Tuesday, 30 October)
Summary of 25 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Teleconference
Susan Lesch
(Tuesday, 30 October)
Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available
Daniel Weitzner
(Tuesday, 30 October)
Re: Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available
Daniel Phillips
(Tuesday, 30 October)
Re: Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available
Antonio Arauzo
(Tuesday, 30 October)
Stop Paying For Porn! Join 4 Free Is Here! 27285338
Join4FreeFrenzy@J4F.com
(Tuesday, 30 October)
I oppose the use of patented technology in w3c standards
Michael Crawford
(Monday, 29 October)
Employment / HR solution
Sara@w3.org
(Monday, 29 October)
Employment / HR solution
Sara@w3.org
(Monday, 29 October)
Patent Policy
Todd Weiler
(Monday, 29 October)
Re: Patent Policy
Ken Martin
(Tuesday, 2 October)
SVENSKA WAYPOINT SIDAN
reveal@bredband.net
(Monday, 29 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
viktor@hot.ee
(Monday, 29 October)
Protect your family from cell phone radiation
Warning@sar-shield.com
(Monday, 29 October)
From: DBBROADCAST
DBBROADCAST
(Sunday, 28 October)
Marketing is the LIFEBLOOD of your Business AYNOC
InternetSales7@excite.com
(Sunday, 28 October)
Need a Home Loan? Let Us Help!
Kevin Anderson
(Saturday, 27 October)
Your Engineering web site is NOT Being SEEN!
Important Message!
(Saturday, 27 October)
Pre-Approved $5000 Platinum Credit Card !
credit@new-credit-report.com
(Friday, 26 October)
PATO: Collective Security In the Age of Software Patents
Mark Bucciarelli
(Friday, 26 October)
NO, NO, NO!
0liv
(Friday, 26 October)
Vous vendez des vhicules
mailing
(Friday, 26 October)
私生活観察マニュアルとは・・・
adulty@nozo.kk.jp
(Friday, 26 October)
hi :o)
Linda A. Langden
(Friday, 26 October)
Hey, check this out!
QB Challenge
(Thursday, 25 October)
MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards"
Martijn Dekker
(Thursday, 25 October)
Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards"
Jason Antony
(Friday, 26 October)
[OT] Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards"
Daniel Phillips
(Friday, 26 October)
Re: [OT] Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards"
Jason Antony
(Monday, 29 October)
Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards"
Daniel Phillips
(Friday, 26 October)
WEB infrastructure and RAND
Lowell Harris
(Thursday, 25 October)
企業可應用NETSCREEN防火牆建置網路安全連線環境,並使不同服務享受不同頻寬,有效利用ADSL寬頻達成企業虛擬網路連線.
~T@w3.org
(Thursday, 25 October)
supply silicon metal and magnesium ingots
sales@globalsilicon.com
(Thursday, 25 October)
Mortgage Leads Available!
disk343@excite.com
(Thursday, 25 October)
Why I have not spoken personally about the patent policy issue
Tim Berners-Lee
(Wednesday, 24 October)
Re: Why I have not spoken personally about the patent policy issue
Jason Antony
(Thursday, 25 October)
What is "reasonable" anyway?
Federico Heinz
(Wednesday, 24 October)
RE: What is "reasonable" anyway?
Stern, Richard H.
(Wednesday, 24 October)
Re: What is "reasonable" anyway?
chuck weinberger
(Thursday, 25 October)
Play a hilarious prank call
Computerised Prank Calls
(Wednesday, 24 October)
W3C - Self examination time!
Blake Courtney
(Wednesday, 24 October)
MARKETING
MF
(Tuesday, 23 October)
Talking Hand Held Dictionary Translator...
Language Teacher, Inc.
(Tuesday, 23 October)
I Oppose the proposed Patent Policy Framework, dated August 16, 2001
Lynn Walton
(Tuesday, 23 October)
Quality conferencing at a low cost
longdistance@repia.com
(Monday, 22 October)
ȭ ġ ~~~
nike@nike.com
(Monday, 22 October)
Fwd: Play a hilarious prank call
Brian Fletcher
(Sunday, 21 October)
Make some extra money using the internet
RussSend@aol.com
(Sunday, 21 October)
I don't like it
依瑪貓
(Sunday, 21 October)
Re: I don't like it
Antonio Arauzo
(Monday, 22 October)
Centro de Rehabilitacin mental y tratamiento de adicciones.
Arlana
(Saturday, 20 October)
Make A Chunk Of Money
Excel In Life
(Friday, 19 October)
Start a home business
boudha@abacom.com
(Friday, 19 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Godefroid Chapelle
(Friday, 19 October)
RAND patents
Dan Devine
(Friday, 19 October)
UK WEBCAM LIST
Darron Callender
(Thursday, 18 October)
[홍보]유학가격★폭격쎄일★누구나 갈수있는기회!도전하세요!!
Youn, Roy
(Thursday, 18 October)
W3C position on patents / business methods
John Skelton
(Thursday, 18 October)
No To The Patent Policy
Joe Morris
(Thursday, 18 October)
NO TO RAND (even after 11 October!)
tim bacon
(Thursday, 18 October)
**SPECIAL**COMPUTER MEMORY
memorytogo@memorytogo4.com
(Thursday, 18 October)
patent logic
S. Vikram
(Thursday, 18 October)
patent logic
S. Vikram
(Thursday, 18 October)
Make A Chunk Of Money
Excel In Life
(Thursday, 18 October)
Against fees
Robert Hooton
(Wednesday, 3 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you
friendz@openxxx.net
(Monday, 15 October)
XenoFORM
XenoFORM team.
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Make A Chunk Of Money
Make Money Fast
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
L D
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Re: Patent Policy Framework draft
Anne E. Jablinske
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Software development / ref:1603
Info
(Wednesday, 17 October)
advice 20
morganmarino241@yahoo.com
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Standards are to be STANDARD by Definition
Warren Puckett
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Patent Policy for WWW Standards
Troy W.
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Incorruptible.com News
News@incorruptible.com
(Tuesday, 16 October)
!!!
ludmila
(Wednesday, 17 October)
As suggested in the GNU WEB site..
BODRATO Stefano
(Tuesday, 16 October)
Patents
Anders
(Tuesday, 16 October)
Re: Patents
Antonio Arauzo
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Another boring standard letter which I copied and pasted off the EFF site.
Adrian Hesketh
(Tuesday, 16 October)
Read your profile.......... :)
Mystic Realms
(Tuesday, 16 October)
Mike wanted you to read this.
Jim
(Tuesday, 16 October)
Patent Policy Working Group]
stalbert
(Monday, 15 October)
Indikator vashego uspeha!!!
ludmila
(Tuesday, 16 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you
friendz@openxxx.net
(Monday, 15 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework
Eric Backus
(Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Nobody
(Monday, 15 October)
Make Some Money
Excel In Life
(Monday, 15 October)
Re: Apple comments on the W3C's proposal
Simon Brooke
(Monday, 15 October)
Science-based design and development
Andrey Golokhvastov
(Monday, 15 October)
Maximum Email Profits!
David Scott (Internet Marketing Expert)
(Monday, 15 October)
Anthrax... No, it's NOT a computer virus!
Family Survival News
(Sunday, 14 October)
Patent Policy Framework
Marina Brown
(Sunday, 14 October)
Earn $50,000 or more in 90 days
Chriss@incorruptible.com
(Sunday, 14 October)
New Patriotic American Bald Eagle Screen Saver - Free shareware version available for download - Newsletter mz
John Herron - Eagle Stock Images
(Sunday, 14 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you
friends@openxxx.net
(Sunday, 14 October)
Recent Patent Policy Framework Draft
Baba Kofi Weusijana
(Sunday, 14 October)
(Resend) RAND at W3C would reinforce global inequity
Rick Jelliffe
(Sunday, 14 October)
triggerhappytv
butlerboys@cwctv.net
(Sunday, 14 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx to you
friends@openxxx.net
(Saturday, 13 October)
RAND
Ivan Thomson
(Saturday, 13 October)
Re: RAND
Toni Mueller
(Tuesday, 2 October)
Re: RAND
Micheal Lewis
(Tuesday, 2 October)
don't think so
allen lackey
(Saturday, 13 October)
Re: don't think so
Hans Schulze
(Saturday, 13 October)
what a sham
jeff lackey
(Saturday, 13 October)
Make A Little Money
Excel In Life
(Saturday, 13 October)
image damage, legitimacy of w3c endangered
barbapapa
(Saturday, 13 October)
Patents = Web only for the RICH
john-paul delaney
(Saturday, 13 October)
WWW.ZELDMAN.COM
Vanessa Lintner
(Saturday, 13 October)
web standards should NOT be patented !
Alexander Sirotkin
(Saturday, 13 October)
Your free listing @ JabbasPalace.com
Jabba@JabbasPalace.com
(Saturday, 13 October)
Against the new patent policy.
Simon White
(Friday, 12 October)
Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Daniel J. Weitzner
(Friday, 12 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Daniel Phillips
(Friday, 12 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Daniel J. Weitzner
(Sunday, 14 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Jason Antony
(Sunday, 14 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Daniel J. Weitzner
(Sunday, 14 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Jason Antony
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Edoardo Dezani
(Sunday, 14 October)
Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process
Scott Davis
(Tuesday, 16 October)
"AGAINST INSANE RAND POLICY"
M Mamoun
(Friday, 12 October)
The Social/Political Role of the W3C
Brad Herman
(Friday, 12 October)
Web standards, W3C and others.
derek lane
(Friday, 12 October)
Another $0.02 against.
Michael Burford (GetRight)
(Friday, 12 October)
THIS IS AN AWFUL IDEA
LoreWeaver
(Friday, 12 October)
No patents or license rights on the web!
Jack Martinez
(Friday, 12 October)
Patent policy comment
hogarth
(Friday, 12 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
John Taylor
(Friday, 12 October)
www-patentpolicy-comment
Randolph Vail
(Friday, 12 October)
Patents and standards
El-Gayar, Omar
(Friday, 12 October)
RAND
rdean71@cs.com
(Friday, 12 October)
ACTIVADORES BIOLGICOS PARA ELIMINAR OLORES. PUBLICIDAD!
!PUBLICIDAD
(Friday, 12 October)
I realize this is a bit late...
Seairth Jacobs
(Friday, 12 October)
RAND IS BAD
John Dooley Road Runner
(Friday, 12 October)
PC FLORIPA Informtica - Tudo para seu computador
PC FLORIPA Informtica
(Friday, 12 October)
Don't do it !
Jean-Yves Delort
(Friday, 12 October)
Protect your life !
protect@life-protect.com
(Friday, 12 October)
Plese, no RAND!!
Marco Maggesi
(Friday, 12 October)
10 8 14:00ÿ ߴٴϱ.. ^^v
top
(Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself !
info@life-protect.com
(Friday, 12 October)
RAND Comments
August Zajonc
(Friday, 12 October)
asda
nepp@df.copm
(Friday, 12 October)
asda
nepp@df.copm
(Friday, 12 October)
Opinion
Dominic Ringuet
(Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself !
info@life-protect.com
(Friday, 12 October)
Vague definitions involve a vague future.
Edward Champion
(Friday, 12 October)
Opinion on Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
M Birch
(Friday, 12 October)
Meta4z.com Website Giveaway!
will
(Friday, 12 October)
Additional thoughts against RAND (long, rambling, possibly incoherent)
Tony Sellers
(Friday, 12 October)
Additional thoughts against RAND (short)
Tony Sellers
(Friday, 12 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Tim Bray
(Friday, 12 October)
RF-only is much better
Anant Sahai
(Friday, 12 October)
Policy is self-contradictory and could sideline W3C
Mark Shewmaker
(Friday, 12 October)
What are you, idiots?
Jorey Bump
(Friday, 12 October)
RAND vs Universal Access; many other loopholes
Neal McBurnett
(Friday, 12 October)
I'm opposed to the "reasonable and non-discriminatory" (RAND) licensing option
John White
(Friday, 12 October)
Electronic Frontier Foundation comments
Seth David Schoen
(Friday, 12 October)
Opposition to RAND Patent Policy
Amit Sahai
(Friday, 12 October)
Comment on W3C's proposed (RAND) Patent Policy
John L. Males
(Friday, 12 October)
Re: Comment on W3C's proposed (RAND) Patent Policy
Jason Antony
(Friday, 12 October)
New T-shirts screenprints with original art
Forrest Bass
(Friday, 12 October)
Reject the Patent Policy Framework.
Brock Frazier
(Friday, 12 October)
On the W3C and Openness...
Joe Crawford
(Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself !
info@life-protect.com
(Friday, 12 October)
Attn: the W3C
Jason Antony
(Friday, 12 October)
SchemaSoft comments on 16 Aug 2001 W3C Patent Policy Framework
Philip Mansfield
(Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself !
info@life-protect.com
(Friday, 12 October)
Love of w3c vs. Devotion to free software
tom@croft.tc
(Thursday, 11 October)
Uselicensing in W3C standards
Mike McCune
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6)
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6)
(Friday, 12 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
Paul H. Smith
(Friday, 12 October)
Recall: Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6)
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6)
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6)
(Friday, 12 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards
BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6)
(Sunday, 14 October)
SoftQuad Software's comments on the patent policy
Lauren Wood
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND
Jon Snader
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft and RAND
weston
(Thursday, 11 October)
seed corn
William Loughborough
(Thursday, 11 October)
NO royalty on WWW
Seung Hyun Kim
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent is not standard
서돈키호테
(Thursday, 11 October)
an extraordinarily bad idea
Matthew Walker
(Thursday, 11 October)
A Comment on the Proposed Patent Policy and the ensuing controversy (reformatted)
Paul Levy
(Thursday, 11 October)
XenoFORM
XenoFORM team.
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Disaster
Tex Horning
(Thursday, 11 October)
Royalty-free patents only, please
Allen Smith
(Thursday, 11 October)
Apple Computer's Statement on the Draft W3C Patent Policy
Wanda Cox
(Thursday, 11 October)
A Comment on the Proposed Patent Policy and the ensuing controversy
Paul Levy
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy
Gregory Catalone
(Thursday, 11 October)
Oppose Patents
Mark Bartlett
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND Proposals
Alex Hogarth
(Thursday, 11 October)
Comments
Patrick Chapman
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND considered harmful
rand.w3c@bernard-hugueney.org
(Thursday, 11 October)
Iper1 per l'e-commerce
blumoda@tiscalinet.it
(Thursday, 11 October)
Meta4z.com Website Giveaway!
will
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy
Mark Maloney
(Thursday, 11 October)
Contribution to W3C consultation
Charles Stewart
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Draft
nucleus
(Thursday, 11 October)
Future High Level Functionality
Mark Johnson
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Feedback
Phillip Fox
(Thursday, 11 October)
Last day of comments, nothing changed
Daniel Phillips
(Thursday, 11 October)
PATENTS & THE WORLD WIDE WEB
Jonathan Bullen
(Thursday, 11 October)
NO!
Ryan Guenther
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND bad, RF Good
R. Steven Rainwater
(Thursday, 11 October)
About the patent policy in W3C web standards
Luca Saiu
(Thursday, 11 October)
Proposed RAND Licensing arrangements
Wally Pratt
(Thursday, 11 October)
Fatal Weaknesses of the Patent Disclosure Rules: and the Unocal P atent Debacle
Peter DiMauro
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Nancy Massey
(Thursday, 11 October)
"RAND" policy
Steve Summit
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: "RAND" policy
Jason Antony
(Friday, 12 October)
Request for feedback.
David Woodhouse
(Thursday, 11 October)
Anasil - software network analyzer
Anasil
(Thursday, 11 October)
Hi from Nick of 6 ,fuller ave
newdynamic
(Thursday, 11 October)
Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework
Michel Debar
(Thursday, 11 October)
patent policy
Tarun Ramakrishna Elankath
(Thursday, 11 October)
Proposed RAND licensing arrangements
Mike Brodbelt
(Thursday, 11 October)
patents on the web
Oz Barron
(Thursday, 11 October)
Opposition to RAND Proposal
Glenn Elliott
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Svein Pedersen
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patented Internet standards are wrong
John Hansknecht
(Thursday, 11 October)
Don't drown the spirit of generosity.
Rory Ewins
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: Don't drown the spirit of generosity.
Glenn Randers-Pehrson
(Thursday, 11 October)
Concerned about patent policy
Bradley M. Kuhn
(Wednesday, 10 October)
standards require RF
Gemeinnutz@LuftHans.com
(Thursday, 11 October)
W3C Patent Policy
Claire Hitchfield
(Thursday, 11 October)
What he said
Stuart Robertson
(Thursday, 11 October)
Setting Standards for the On-line Community
Tom Worthington
(Thursday, 11 October)
Listen to OSI and Mozilla
Tore Ferner
(Thursday, 11 October)
The Web is not just for business
Chris Rimmer
(Thursday, 11 October)
My objection to Patent of Internet standards
Scottie \
(Thursday, 11 October)
Comments of Patent policy
Marc
(Thursday, 11 October)
comments
Mark Ellis
(Thursday, 11 October)
Cadastro
944411@yahoo.com
(Thursday, 11 October)
comments on patent policy
Mark Ellis
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent policy comment
Alisdair Odd
(Thursday, 11 October)
Freedom is essential for Innovation
Ajeet P Velankar
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND Proposal
Jeff Herrin
(Thursday, 11 October)
Thanks
Jim Conway
(Thursday, 11 October)
Use of `RAND' patents
D. Tweed
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND licencing proposal
Michael Zajac
(Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
linukes@hushmail.com
(Thursday, 11 October)
Standards should help education
Rafael Calvo
(Thursday, 11 October)
The general public will fight back
Rodger L. Finnestead
(Thursday, 11 October)
open, free standards
rob@robnet.com
(Thursday, 11 October)
RAND considered harmful
Steven Pothier
(Thursday, 11 October)
Objections to RAND Licensing Mode activities
Steven W McDougall
(Thursday, 11 October)
One little voice against
Brett Merkey
(Thursday, 11 October)
No to Unreasonable and Discriminatory Standards
Rajendra Shrestha
(Thursday, 11 October)
OFFER FOR HELP
edward mambo
(Thursday, 11 October)
Re: OFFER FOR HELP
Diana Muir
(Tuesday, 30 October)
Patent Policy Framework Comment
sdrie
(Thursday, 11 October)
what are you thinking????
Scott Staab
(Thursday, 11 October)
patent policy
Ben van 't Ende
(Wednesday, 10 October)
New public W3 standards involving RAND licensing conditions.
m.Lund
(Wednesday, 10 October)
in doubt & uncertain
J. van Gorkum
(Wednesday, 10 October)
patent policy
Joel T Schneider
(Wednesday, 10 October)
opinion on patent policy
krista gallagher
(Wednesday, 10 October)
I Oppose RAND
tony@nhfpl.org
(Wednesday, 10 October)
"RAND" policy
Don
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Opera Software's postion
Håkon Wium Lie
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Support Open Web Standards
Greg Kise
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Apple's RAND licensing, prior art, and the W3C process
Neil Harris
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
ccooke@indigo.ie
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy Comment / Objecting to RAND
psevetson@netscape.net
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Subject: "NO" TO RAND LICENSING
Bruce Lunde
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Just say no
Chip Mefford
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Policy
Valden Longhurst
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: Policy
Dunn_Bill@emc.com
(Wednesday, 10 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Roozbeh Pournader
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Keep the web open and alive
Dr. Michael Evans
(Wednesday, 10 October)
WWW Patent Policy makes same mistake as dead dot-coms
Joseph Wang
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent policy
Richard Walker
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patents = Friction
John Medcalf
(Wednesday, 10 October)
RAND direction proposal
Alexander Stohr
(Wednesday, 10 October)
petition
dpytlewski@idea.net.pl
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on draft Patent Policy Framework
Joycelyn Maddux
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Proposed patent policy
Greg Ward
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy comment
Jason L. Gohlke
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Suggestions for alternative procedure
David Balch
(Wednesday, 10 October)
RAND: A Bad Thing
Peter H.
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patents
rick@dimensionsinteractive.com
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Don't put your hands in my pourse !!!
Nazar
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Branded/Private Label Realtime Internet Travel Booking Engine in Eleven Languages
John Hazlewood
(Wednesday, 10 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Ben Wrighton - Wapdesign
(Wednesday, 10 October)
open source is open mind
Trahojen
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Risks to content (digital rights management) in proposed framework
Andy Oram
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Doing a PhD?
Mark Coppel
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Applause
Glenn Randers-Pehrson
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy
Mark Plowman
(Wednesday, 10 October)
500 billion not enough for MS?
Jsphrsa@aol.com
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Jens Laland
(Wednesday, 10 October)
This is not a good idea
Lars Nielsen Lind
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on the proposal
Paul Pathiakis
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on the proposal
James Green
(Wednesday, 10 October)
No to RAND
David Wright
(Wednesday, 10 October)
My disquiet at RAND licenses
Rajnish Bhaskar
(Wednesday, 10 October)
wealthocracy corrupting meritocracy - funding strategy proposal
Tom Cowap
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Request to extend public comment period
Jason Antony
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Jozef Halbersztadt
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Request to extend public comment period
Jason Antony
(Wednesday, 10 October)
New Friends From Bermuda!?
Bermuda Seek
(Wednesday, 10 October)
I reject a proprietary W3C
pressio main
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Since when is the web for sale?
Bea Fontaine
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Policy Draft
Robin Peters
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Exclusion
Frank Schafer
(Wednesday, 10 October)
patent policy framework draft
Austin Brooks
(Wednesday, 10 October)
patented protocols.
Michael Mounteney
(Wednesday, 10 October)
I am disappointed
Martin Kutschker
(Wednesday, 10 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework
michael
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Web Standards
NLK
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Regarding recent Patent Policy Framework draft
Daniel LaBell
(Wednesday, 10 October)
www Power Grab
Donald Kleyensteuber
(Wednesday, 10 October)
No RAND in Patent Policy Framework Draft
Scott Busby
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Keep the WWW a free zone
Philip and Shelia McArdle
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Say It Ain't So, Joe
Patricia West
(Wednesday, 10 October)
No to RAND licensing
Carl Douglas
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on RAND in three sections
Steven Healey
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Christopher Blizzard
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Lee T S
(Thursday, 11 October)
Looking for Mortgage Leads??? -racbflg
thunderbird@jufuceyj.yahoo.com
(Thursday, 11 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Roberto Schulz
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment]
Alek Lynge
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Additional comments to W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Evelio Perez-Albuerne
(Wednesday, 10 October)
About Your Resource
webmaster@axxxhome.com
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Nothing to say but "no"
Jose Luis Pumarega
(Wednesday, 10 October)
SEXWEB NO.1 .. MEGAWEB-SEX !
EROTICAWWW
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Reasons not to accept patents into standards
Matthew Boulos
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Comments on Patent Policy Draft
matthew@toseland.f9.co.uk
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND licensing should not be allowed
Nathaniel Gray
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees
Jeffrey Zeldman
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees
Daniel Phillips
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees
Jason Antony
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees
Steven Champeon
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees
Jason Antony
(Wednesday, 10 October)
so...how much is Microsoft paying you?
Robin Shaw
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Web Patents
Davi
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Established Standards
Eldon King
(Tuesday, 9 October)
FW: RAND licensing proposal.
Doug Dingus
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND
Robert Bergesch
(Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
jose lorenzo
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Clear Consequences
Matthew C. Tedder
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Publicity For Less - (Specialty Media Lists Available)
PublicityWorks@netscape.net
(Tuesday, 9 October)
patent-response
Edward Renaud
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Stay Open
Paul Tichonczuk
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Bookstore & Library Databases (400+ New Libraries; 175 New Age Bookstores)
PublicityWorks@netscape.net
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy draft.
John Hornstein
(Tuesday, 9 October)
There Was Once a Vision of a Free Internet
Mark Herman II
(Tuesday, 9 October)
I object!!
Gayle Knutson
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Royalty-free (RF) is the only acceptable 'compromise'
Ralph Hyre
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy
Gerard Boissy
(Tuesday, 9 October)
KIO
Raymond Pirouz
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND objection
Bryan Montford
(Tuesday, 9 October)
no patents please
Loe, Steven
(Tuesday, 9 October)
OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy
Eric S. Raymond
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy
Maurice Aubrey
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy
TopXML - Mark Wilson
(Wednesday, 10 October)
RAND objection
Mark Brader
(Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Timothy Hinds
(Tuesday, 9 October)
In Response To Proposed Patent Policy
cbma
(Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Jim Webb
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Anti-Trust Issues of RAND
Daniel Probst
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Disappointed
Steven.H.Rogers@seagate.com
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Jonathan Borden
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Jonathan Borden
(Tuesday, 9 October)
No to RAND as it is proposed
Marc Verwerft
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Jonathan Borden
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Jonathan Borden
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
(Wednesday, 10 October)
--- dont quite understand this
eddie wilson
(Tuesday, 9 October)
No, no no
Cory Shubert
(Tuesday, 9 October)
W3C Patent Policy
Jon Slaton
(Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Kai Kunze
(Tuesday, 9 October)
W3C standards should be free
Asle Benoni
(Tuesday, 9 October)
A Case for Freedom
massey
(Tuesday, 9 October)
My thoughts on the Patency Policy draft
Glen Scott
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND licensing is bad
Ted Wright
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Please fax two copies of your promotional literature to 08717171250.
phone.08717171249@fax.08717171250
(Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Madden, Francis
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Thoughts on your Patent proposal
Henrik Jönsson
(Tuesday, 9 October)
World Wide Web Consortium - Patent Policy Working Group
wendybrek@mixcom.com
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Human evolution.
Manos Batsis
(Tuesday, 9 October)
A query about RF
Jason Antony
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Re: A query about RF
Chris Lilley
(Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: A query about RF
Jason Antony
(Friday, 12 October)
Re: A query about RF
Chris Lilley
(Friday, 12 October)
A few more comments (this time on the specific wording of the "W3C Patent Policy Framework")
Jesper Juhl
(Tuesday, 9 October)
www-patentpolicy-comment
James
(Monday, 8 October)
Comment
Voluspa
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Define RAND
Pat Mahoney
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework
Bill Zaumen
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND: sounds like end of free web software, originator of WWW & W3C
Danilo Almeida
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND
cfb@sol.usc.edu
(Tuesday, 9 October)
If you feel fees must be charged, could a "sliding" scale be used
steve and allana
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND Licensing is Counterproductive
Bill Gunn
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Supporting software patents undermines credibility of W3C
Dwayne C. Litzenberger
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Proposed Patent Royalty Policy for WWW
Bobgmoss@aol.com
(Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND and Rolalty-Free Licensing Mode
James Gartside
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy comments
Bob McDonald
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Not a good idea
Dan Phiffer
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy
gregory.d.dickson@accenture.com
(Monday, 8 October)
oppose abuse of patent system to limit web free flow of information
paul ih
(Tuesday, 9 October)
Comments on patent Policy
Cathy Gage
(Tuesday, 9 October)
No Patents
LMichelle
(Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Oscar Zurita
(Wednesday, 17 October)
Essential Claim question
Noble, Lisa
(Monday, 8 October)
Comments
Jon Wiley
(Monday, 8 October)
Open Web!
John Abbe
(Monday, 8 October)
comments on proposals
Lisa Lorenzin
(Monday, 8 October)
Eurolinux statement on W3C RAND proposal
Stefane Fermigier
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND licensing
John Carey
(Monday, 8 October)
New forums/massage-board. Please join now!
this-is-the-shit
(Monday, 8 October)
New forums/massage-board. Please join now!
this-is-the-shit
(Monday, 8 October)
please don't
Joe Desbonnet
(Monday, 8 October)
patent policy
Daniel Webb
(Monday, 8 October)
Patents are damage
Steven W McDougall
(Monday, 8 October)
Royalties
Mariner's Loft
(Monday, 8 October)
Disagreement with new Patent Policy draft
Paul Erickson
(Monday, 8 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework working draft
Bob Goates
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Framework
Rob Simmons
(Monday, 8 October)
DON"T RECOMEND RAND
Kyle Cranmer
(Monday, 8 October)
the W3C has a virus
Robert Stockmann
(Monday, 8 October)
Bad Idea
mplemmons@ee.net
(Monday, 8 October)
Disagree with RAND license
Arnaud Vaneste
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy draft
Massimo, Tiziana e Federica
(Monday, 8 October)
say NO to RAND licensing
N.Oden
(Monday, 8 October)
Please do not stop innovation in its' tracks
Mason Miller
(Monday, 8 October)
policy
ht
(Monday, 8 October)
Do not cater to the large corporations
Carolyn Hillman
(Monday, 8 October)
Sorry to see this happening
Roman
(Monday, 8 October)
"Non-discriminatory" commercial licenses impossible
Adrian Tymes
(Monday, 8 October)
Patented standards are not standards.
chris.gamble@CPBINC.com
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND is a bad Idea
Karl Doblinger
(Monday, 8 October)
Please Rethink Your Policy
Hythian
(Monday, 8 October)
Free Software compatibility
Dmitry Borodaenko
(Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Douglas Holt
(Monday, 8 October)
The RAND proposed in the Patent Policy Framework
Yves Savourel
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND Patent Policy - Against
davis
(Monday, 8 October)
No thanks
Morten rsted, [MOCH]
(Monday, 8 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework
Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org
(Monday, 8 October)
WaSP to W3C: Remember Your Mission
Steven Champeon
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND
Ryan Rajpaul
(Monday, 8 October)
Comment
BEN BARRAZA
(Monday, 8 October)
If you love them, then run to them.
nopatents@onmyweb.com
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy
Dhruva Reddy
(Monday, 8 October)
Comments to "In support of EFF's call for a royalty-free licensing model"
Martin Olsson
(Monday, 8 October)
Why RAND will kill the W3C
Mark Mumford
(Monday, 8 October)
wc3
Lorntz
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Comment
Andrew Meredith
(Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
CoyoteinCA@netscape.net
(Monday, 8 October)
Draft proposal allowing Patents in W3C standards
Josh Fryman
(Monday, 8 October)
Six issues
arle lommel
(Monday, 8 October)
Re: Six issues
Jim Sansing
(Monday, 8 October)
Don't do it.
Bill Evans
(Monday, 8 October)
PATENTS
John Seago
(Monday, 8 October)
Keep the Web (Royalty) Free
Mark Anderson*INTERACTIVE*
(Monday, 8 October)
Objection to RAND
Stuart Gaunt
(Monday, 8 October)
The Patent Policy Framework
Diego Lunetta
(Monday, 8 October)
in support of patent-free standards
Tom Garcia
(Monday, 8 October)
w3c RAND licence
laurent
(Monday, 8 October)
The W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft is totally unacceptable
Toby Perkins
(Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Thomas Longuemart
(Monday, 8 October)
Don't do it!
Ostergaard, AJ
(Monday, 8 October)
In support of EFF's call for a royalty-free licensing model
Peter Magnusson
(Monday, 8 October)
well..
Gilbert Fernandes
(Monday, 8 October)
Stop
Michael Wood
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Working Group
Ricardo Campos
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
John Billings
(Monday, 8 October)
common sense
valko yotov
(Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Michael Clarke
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND will either kill W3C or the internet
David Jander
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND Policy Will Destroy The Internet
Aaron Swenson
(Monday, 8 October)
Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND ->DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)
chuck weinberger
(Monday, 8 October)
bad idea
bwg
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy on web standards - my concerns
simeon.morgan@ideas.com.au
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent policy is madness
Ignacio Torres Masdeu
(Monday, 8 October)
Vote no on rolaties
bink
(Monday, 8 October)
comments
Alice Corbin
(Monday, 8 October)
patents: whaddyew, crazy?
Ray Gulick
(Monday, 8 October)
Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory ?
La Place
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND
J
(Monday, 8 October)
Free money Making Website ! Costs Of Address
raserat2001@yahoo.com
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
The Rev. Tony Begonja
(Sunday, 7 October)
Comment on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Stuart Ambler
(Sunday, 7 October)
No RAND licensing
Alan Chiu
(Monday, 8 October)
RAND & W3C Standards
Paul Dundas
(Monday, 8 October)
Re: RAND & W3C Standards
Daniel Phillips
(Monday, 8 October)
Stupid
Ukiah Smith
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy
Matthew Arieta
(Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy
Eric Johnson
(Sunday, 7 October)
another NO vote for RAND licensing
paulc@best.com
(Sunday, 7 October)
Cease & Desist
C. B. Yarling
(Sunday, 7 October)
Scenarios related to PPG Proposal
derek lane
(Sunday, 7 October)
"NO" TO RAND LICENSING
Mike Leary
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: New list - www-patentpolicy-comment - maintained by djweitzner@w3.org
Linda Morris
(Sunday, 7 October)
patent policy
michael d. henry
(Sunday, 7 October)
WWW Patent Policy
Narada Hess
(Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Meg Otto
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND
Tor Perkins
(Sunday, 7 October)
Say NO to RAND licensing
David Mosher
(Sunday, 7 October)
Comments
Al Johnson
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Framework
Thomas H. Mitchell, C.P.A.
(Sunday, 7 October)
public comment
Charles Geyer
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND patent licensing
Phil Quinn
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND patent licensing
Fred Condo
(Sunday, 7 October)
Effect of public outrage?[was Re: SVG]
William Loughborough
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patent licensing decision
Kevin
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: Patent licensing decision
Bob Hayes
(Sunday, 7 October)
W3C patent policy
Richard
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: W3C patent policy
Dylan Thurston
(Wednesday, 3 October)
Something that scares me
Jason Antony
(Thursday, 4 October)
Why
Kenneth R Westerback
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND
Dan Howard
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patents don't belong on the WWW
David Smith
(Sunday, 7 October)
plea against RAND patents in W3C standards
Bjoern Kriews
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND / Patent: NO !
Juergen Sauer
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND licensing and Free Software
Alexandre Dulaunoy
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)
Claude Zervas
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND ->DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)
Chris Lilley
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)
Daniel Phillips
(Sunday, 7 October)
sack members
John Priestley
(Saturday, 6 October)
Free money Making Website ! Get One Before They R Gone I Got Mine
raserat2001@yahoo.com
(Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
RM
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy
Clifford Satlow
(Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Janette Seidel
(Sunday, 7 October)
Three substantial comments
dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp
(Sunday, 7 October)
dangerous proposal
Peter Lin
(Tuesday, 2 October)
W3C Patent Policy
Russ Howard
(Tuesday, 2 October)
Re: RF > RAMMED ... sorry, I screwed up a link...
Chris Worley
(Tuesday, 2 October)
No Subject
dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patents restrict progress
Michael Rowehl
(Sunday, 7 October)
Three substantial comments
dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy - Setting the bar on "where it is not possible"
Steven Weinstein
(Sunday, 7 October)
RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C
TopXML - Mark Wilson
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C
Adam Warner
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C
Adam Warner
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C
TopXML - Mark Wilson
(Sunday, 7 October)
Don't allow standards based on RAND Licenses
B.J. Herbison
(Sunday, 7 October)
H.E.L.L.N.O. to R.A.N.D!
Mike Amundsen
(Saturday, 6 October)
Revised patent policy proposal
Ippolito, Mark E.
(Saturday, 6 October)
Against the RAND initiative
Stephen Wynne
(Saturday, 6 October)
No to RAND
Sumanth Sukumar
(Saturday, 6 October)
Against the Patent Policy
Pedro Gil
(Saturday, 6 October)
Well, its been fun...
Claude Zervas
(Saturday, 6 October)
RAND
Eric Jacobsen
(Saturday, 6 October)
License fees
Ekkard Schnedermann
(Saturday, 6 October)
Patents
Svend Ezaki Tofte
(Saturday, 6 October)
what are you doing?!
josh penrod
(Saturday, 6 October)
Enough about RAND
Ray van der Woning
(Saturday, 6 October)
Royalty Free YES, rand NO
Tyler R Holcomb
(Saturday, 6 October)
Rand Policy
A.J. Madu
(Saturday, 6 October)
W3C Patent Policy
Peter Goode
(Saturday, 6 October)
I vote for free standards
Jussi Hirvi
(Saturday, 6 October)
Response to Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
José Luis Otermin
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: Response to Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Mike Todd
(Wednesday, 10 October)
w3c: patent (entrance barrier)
R. Ivan Linderman \(best\)
(Saturday, 6 October)
Breaking off
Afonso Fernandez Nogueira
(Saturday, 6 October)
patent concern
Willis, Kevin J
(Saturday, 6 October)
DON'T
Orsted [Achtung]
(Saturday, 6 October)
Allowing Patents on W3C standards will make the w3c redundant
Christian Schaller
(Saturday, 6 October)
You need to rethink your preposal about patented tech.
Martin Veise
(Saturday, 6 October)
Please don't shackle the web
Khuzaima A. Lakdawala
(Saturday, 6 October)
Patents
Gregory Carter
(Thursday, 4 October)
Concerned about the Patent Policy
Peter Hanappe
(Saturday, 6 October)
RAND (no kidding :)
Lance Levsen
(Saturday, 6 October)
Comment on The Patenting Info
Keith Vick
(Saturday, 6 October)
Why the sudden change of mind from W3C?
David List
(Saturday, 6 October)
RAND licensing = Bad Idea
whj whj
(Saturday, 6 October)
www-patentpolicy-comment
Joris Van den Bergh
(Saturday, 6 October)
Patent Policy Framework Draft
Mark Koscak
(Saturday, 6 October)
another vote against implementing RAND licensing procedures
CPausheek@aol.com
(Saturday, 6 October)
abuse of patents should not extend into standards realm
John McMahon
(Saturday, 6 October)
Conern of the term "reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty fees"
Paul H. Smith
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: Conern of the term "reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty fees"
chuck weinberger
(Saturday, 6 October)
comments about Patent Policy Framework draft
Jason Brown
(Saturday, 6 October)
Patent policy comments
Terry Griffin
(Saturday, 6 October)
I believe the W3C should not endorse Patented Technologies
Shlomi Fish
(Saturday, 6 October)
Crazy
nam nguyen quoc
(Saturday, 6 October)
Advice from a Modem War Survivor
chuck weinberger
(Saturday, 6 October)
Wrong thing going RAND
Ky Vinh
(Saturday, 6 October)
proposed W3C patent policy
Dave_Touretzky@cs.cmu.edu
(Saturday, 6 October)
Concerning Patents
rdibble@dibble.net
(Saturday, 6 October)
LiveJournal Opposes RAND
Mark Kraft
(Saturday, 6 October)
w3.org renamed to w3.com and retired
tokiko
(Saturday, 6 October)
OT: IETF [was: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>]
Jason Antony
(Saturday, 6 October)
AGAINST RAND policy
3L@xwinds.com
(Saturday, 6 October)
W3C Policy Breakdown
Sean B. Palmer
(Saturday, 6 October)
Rand licensing
Barbara Pratt
(Saturday, 6 October)
Patent Policy Working Group
Curtis Hawthorne
(Saturday, 6 October)
RAND licencing would lead to incompatibility problems
Arto Teräs
(Saturday, 6 October)
RAND licencing will re-define meaning of "standard"
Risto Jokinen
(Saturday, 6 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Greg Doran
(Saturday, 6 October)
RE: W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft
Andy Chase
(Tuesday, 2 October)
Turning the W3 into an impenetrable oligarchy
kjensen
(Friday, 5 October)
Against RAND from Singapore
Seamus Phan
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
(Friday, 5 October)
Introduction of patents? God forbid!
vivek achary
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND licensing
Miaoling Chiu
(Friday, 5 October)
Regarding the use of patented technologies in standards
Paul Lee
(Wednesday, 3 October)
patents and the 3w
Richard Lyons
(Friday, 5 October)
Allowing patented software into standards
Brian Clancey
(Wednesday, 3 October)
Strongly disapprove
David Collier-Brown
(Thursday, 4 October)
Changename: W3C to P3C
Joe Doran
(Friday, 5 October)
NO
Jerry Wood
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Changes would cause problems - but not insurmountable ones.
Peter Street
(Friday, 5 October)
No to patents
Wanderley Ceschim
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Mike Dewey
(Friday, 5 October)
No RAND
Jim Edwards
(Friday, 5 October)
Patents
Alan Woodland
(Friday, 5 October)
Formal Comment on W3C Patent Policy Framework, Working Draft 16
Stephen Satchell
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND policy et. al.
Douglas Stillinger
(Friday, 5 October)
royalty-free web standards
Jim Phillips
(Friday, 5 October)
open standards
nicholas paredes
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
jduell@alumni.princeton.edu
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent policy
Sascha Brawer
(Friday, 5 October)
Objection to the RAND licensing option in the proposed policy.
Fred Sturman
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND "standards"
Mark W. Alexander
(Friday, 5 October)
The proposed change
Gerald Albitre
(Friday, 5 October)
response to RAND Patent proposal
Mann, Lydia
(Friday, 5 October)
Fees for web standard products
Ron Bogas
(Friday, 5 October)
Following the Money Trail / Going Backwards on Democracy
Frank Grave de Peralta
(Friday, 5 October)
RF vs. RAND
Mark Christensen
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND licensing option is not sensible
Louis C. Gasper, Ph.D., KHS
(Friday, 5 October)
W3C patent policy
Christoph Weber
(Friday, 5 October)
patent policy comments
Ilya Haykinson
(Friday, 5 October)
The open-source community demands the immediate withdrawal of the proposal for a new W3C Patent Policy !!!!
TISCALI
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Jon Osborn
(Friday, 5 October)
patents in W3C standards
chtodd@core.com
(Friday, 5 October)
PersonalDB.net 회원으로 초대받으셨습니다.
관리자
(Friday, 5 October)
comments on patent policy
Terrell Mitchell
(Friday, 5 October)
Feedback on the Patent Policy Framework draft
Ulrich Berens
(Friday, 5 October)
Patents will undermine useability
Charlie Brooks
(Friday, 5 October)
discriminatory patents
Michiel Ettema
(Friday, 5 October)
What is reasonable?
Eric Richardson
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policies
Karl Lehenbauer
(Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework
Ricardo Signes
(Friday, 5 October)
royalties for web standards? no !
Brian Carroll
(Friday, 5 October)
After all your hard work?
Alison Lister
(Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Millsap, Michael G.
(Friday, 5 October)
We have to ACT
acborges@netcabo.pt
(Friday, 5 October)
Part II: A Concrete Alternative
Steve Waldman
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative
Glenn Randers-Pehrson
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative
Simon Brooke
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative
Daniel Phillips
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative
Jozef Halbersztadt
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative
Carol Bean
(Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Gordon Osse
(Friday, 5 October)
Will The W3C Destroy The Web?
Bill Major
(Friday, 5 October)
Part I: General Comments
Steve Waldman
(Friday, 5 October)
Licensing fees for implementation of standards
Max Rible
(Friday, 5 October)
Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy
Luigi P. Bai
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy
Dunn_Bill@emc.com
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy
Daniel Phillips
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy
Luigi P. Bai
(Friday, 5 October)
Thanks but no thanks.
Brian Carpenter
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Feedback
William E. \
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy
MIKE TAYLOR
(Friday, 5 October)
Support for Open-Source
Stephen C. Scherer
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: Support for Open-Source
Dunn_Bill@emc.com
(Friday, 5 October)
A logical appeal to retain RF standards for Web
sysadmin@pinjax.com
(Friday, 5 October)
patents
Court Demas
(Friday, 5 October)
Proposed RAND Patent Policy
Jeb Potterfield
(Friday, 5 October)
Don't add RAND licensing to the W3C process
Brent J. Nordquist
(Friday, 5 October)
proposed standards
jacques@panix.com
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND Licensing
David Walker
(Friday, 5 October)
w3c proposal on patents
Eric Montgomery
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND will fragment the web
Case, Scott
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: RAND will fragment the web
Jason Antony
(Saturday, 6 October)
Patent Policy Framework
Louis Calitz
(Friday, 5 October)
somethin smell fishy
Ken Forbes
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND Is A Bad Idea
Duane Robertson
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework
Tommy Marcus McGuire
(Friday, 5 October)
Proposal for modification to Member Patent Licensing Commitments.
David Woodhouse
(Friday, 5 October)
web-patent policy comments
Tyler Morrison
(Friday, 5 October)
"NO" on RAND patent policy
Kenn Louis
(Friday, 5 October)
Do not let w3c become a tool for big corporations
Victor Bogado da Silva Lins
(Friday, 5 October)
Why a RAND? W3 & Microsoft/IE --
J. Payne
(Friday, 5 October)
Royalties are discriminatory.
David Andrew Michael Noelle
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND
Shawn Wall
(Friday, 5 October)
my opinion on the subject (Web Technology Patent Area)
Pieter Reint Siegers Kort
(Friday, 5 October)
No to patents in W3C standards.
Russell McOrmond
(Friday, 5 October)
Proposed Patent Policy
John Panzer
(Friday, 5 October)
please rethink your policies regarding patents and RAND,
simon
(Friday, 5 October)
Objection to RAND Licensing
Lori Dupuy
(Friday, 5 October)
NO NO NO!
Daisy Williams
(Wednesday, 3 October)
Objection to RAND Licensing
Paul Dupuy, Jr.
(Friday, 5 October)
my comments on the Patent Policy for WWW Standards
Dieter Van Uytvanck
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND Licensing Option
Lee R Boynton
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy for WWW Standards
John Gisclon
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND Policy for web standards
Richard Coleman
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND implies more changes
Lucio Tato
(Friday, 5 October)
What to do about the W3C?
Dave Winer
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy
Ted Bergeron
(Friday, 5 October)
Science != Bussiness
Gustavo Carvalho Homem
(Friday, 5 October)
The argument against patented protocols is not ideological, it is pragmatic
Russell Sears
(Friday, 5 October)
Support only patent-free technology
Allan Oepping
(Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Ing. Alejandro Vzquez C.
(Friday, 5 October)
Comments on Patent Policy
dat23
(Friday, 5 October)
Don't change now.
Effie Kolbeins
(Friday, 5 October)
Comments on Patent Policy Framework draft
Alex Bischoff
(Friday, 5 October)
STRONG OBJECTION TO the inclusion of RAND
Dr. Mahesh S. Raisinghani
(Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users
Sudhir Gandotra
(Friday, 5 October)
Don't mix standards with patents
Nigel Stewart
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft
Gordon Fischer
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND will be disastrous for the web
Steven Jarvis
(Friday, 5 October)
Standard + RAND = Monopoly
Ron Schofield
(Friday, 5 October)
Comments on patent policy
Leonard Heyman
(Friday, 5 October)
SVG ad inf.
F J Franklin
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
Chris Lilley
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
F J Franklin
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
Daniel Phillips
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
F J Franklin
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
Daniel Phillips
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
Chris Lilley
(Saturday, 6 October)
Re: SVG ad inf.
Theo de Raadt
(Sunday, 7 October)
Tim Berners-Lee [was: SVG ad inf.]
Jason Antony
(Sunday, 7 October)
Re: Tim Berners-Lee [was: SVG ad inf.]
Adam Warner
(Sunday, 7 October)
comment on your patent policy framework draft
ozan s. yigit
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy
Edward Terry
(Friday, 5 October)
Do you listen to the people?
Jenny Ashman
(Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
dean blackketter
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy
Susan Margulies
(Friday, 5 October)
Vote agains the "RAND" policy.
Daniel G. Linder
(Friday, 5 October)
no to RAND licensing
XvDebbyvX@aol.com
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND
Alex Morales
(Friday, 5 October)
Re: IBM's comment on w3c patent policy
ZilF@aol.com
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND vs RF patents
James Hebdon
(Friday, 5 October)
Patents or Standards - Choose One.
J. Mark Turner
(Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Atabey Kaygun
(Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>
Benjamin Edwards
(Friday, 5 October)
Selling out to special interests on Patent Policy
Benjamin Watkins
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policies...
Brian Powell
(Saturday, 6 October)
RAND = BAD idea
Darren Blaser
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND is incompatible with free/opensource implementations
Filipe Santos
(Friday, 5 October)
No to patents
Charles McPhate
(Friday, 5 October)
say no to RAND licensing
Chad K. Bisk
(Friday, 5 October)
You're digging your own grave with this...
Jeppe Cramon
(Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy/RAND Licensing Agreement
BlakGard@aol.com
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND RFPC
1 1
(Friday, 5 October)
open standards are the best way to encourage innovation and interoperability
Tim Edwards
(Friday, 5 October)
Additional sources of commentary that I believe the W3C should know about
Jesper Juhl
(Friday, 5 October)
Just say no
larfx@ticnet.com
(Friday, 5 October)
RAND
Phil Reardon
(Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy
Ronny Krashinsky
(Friday, 5 October)
Comments on W3C patent policy
Paul Schreiber
(Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy
Joe Glenn
(Friday, 5 October)
May you please consider revising your draft?