www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from October 2001: by thread

Amplie suas vendas 111netcon@ieg.com.br (Wednesday, 31 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> comercial (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Dave Reeve (Thursday, 4 October)
- Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> WINTER,CHRIS (HP-Sweden,ex1) (Friday, 5 October)
  - Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Daniel Phillips (Friday, 5 October)
    - OT: IETF [was: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>] Jason Antony (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> cb105 (Friday, 26 October)
Choose 3 Free Lipsticks Offer - While Supplies Last Shop@Manna (Wednesday, 31 October)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-patent-policy-20010816/ Bob Dewey (Wednesday, 31 October)
cool link rixo@mail.de (Tuesday, 30 October)
21世紀超勁爆生涯講座 taipei7@yam.com (Tuesday, 30 October)
Summary of 25 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Teleconference Susan Lesch (Tuesday, 30 October)
Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available Daniel Weitzner (Tuesday, 30 October)
- Re: Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available Daniel Phillips (Tuesday, 30 October)
- Re: Summary of 15-17 October 2001 Patent Policy WG Face-to-Face meeting available Antonio Arauzo (Tuesday, 30 October)
Stop Paying For Porn! Join 4 Free Is Here! 27285338 Join4FreeFrenzy@J4F.com (Tuesday, 30 October)
I oppose the use of patented technology in w3c standards Michael Crawford (Monday, 29 October)
Employment / HR solution Sara@w3.org (Monday, 29 October)
Employment / HR solution Sara@w3.org (Monday, 29 October)
Patent Policy Todd Weiler (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: Patent Policy Ken Martin (Tuesday, 2 October)
SVENSKA WAYPOINT SIDAN reveal@bredband.net (Monday, 29 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> viktor@hot.ee (Monday, 29 October)
Protect your family from cell phone radiation Warning@sar-shield.com (Monday, 29 October)
From: DBBROADCAST DBBROADCAST (Sunday, 28 October)
Marketing is the LIFEBLOOD of your Business AYNOC InternetSales7@excite.com (Sunday, 28 October)
Need a Home Loan? Let Us Help! Kevin Anderson (Saturday, 27 October)
Your Engineering web site is NOT Being SEEN! Important Message! (Saturday, 27 October)
Pre-Approved $5000 Platinum Credit Card ! credit@new-credit-report.com (Friday, 26 October)
PATO: Collective Security In the Age of Software Patents Mark Bucciarelli (Friday, 26 October)
NO, NO, NO! 0liv (Friday, 26 October)
Vous vendez des v�hicules mailing (Friday, 26 October)
私生活観察マニュアルとは・・・ adulty@nozo.kk.jp (Friday, 26 October)
hi :o) Linda A. Langden (Friday, 26 October)
Hey, check this out! QB Challenge (Thursday, 25 October)
MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards" Martijn Dekker (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards" Jason Antony (Friday, 26 October)
  - [OT] Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards" Daniel Phillips (Friday, 26 October)
    - Re: [OT] Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards" Jason Antony (Monday, 29 October)
- Re: MSN blocks non-IE browsers: the real idea with RAND "standards" Daniel Phillips (Friday, 26 October)
WEB infrastructure and RAND Lowell Harris (Thursday, 25 October)
企業可應用NETSCREEN防火牆建置網路安全連線環境,並使不同服務享受不同頻寬,有效利用ADSL寬頻達成企業虛擬網路連線. ��~��T��@w3.org (Thursday, 25 October)
supply silicon metal and magnesium ingots sales@globalsilicon.com (Thursday, 25 October)
Mortgage Leads Available! disk343@excite.com (Thursday, 25 October)
Why I have not spoken personally about the patent policy issue Tim Berners-Lee (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Why I have not spoken personally about the patent policy issue Jason Antony (Thursday, 25 October)
What is "reasonable" anyway? Federico Heinz (Wednesday, 24 October)
- RE: What is "reasonable" anyway? Stern, Richard H. (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: What is "reasonable" anyway? chuck weinberger (Thursday, 25 October)
Play a hilarious prank call Computerised Prank Calls (Wednesday, 24 October)
W3C - Self examination time! Blake Courtney (Wednesday, 24 October)
MARKETING MF (Tuesday, 23 October)
Talking Hand Held Dictionary Translator... Language Teacher, Inc. (Tuesday, 23 October)
I Oppose the proposed Patent Policy Framework, dated August 16, 2001 Lynn Walton (Tuesday, 23 October)
Quality conferencing at a low cost longdistance@repia.com (Monday, 22 October)
ȭ�� ġ�� ~~~ nike@nike.com (Monday, 22 October)
Fwd: Play a hilarious prank call Brian Fletcher (Sunday, 21 October)
Make some extra money using the internet RussSend@aol.com (Sunday, 21 October)
I don't like it 依瑪貓 (Sunday, 21 October)
- Re: I don't like it Antonio Arauzo (Monday, 22 October)
Centro de Rehabilitaci�n mental y tratamiento de adicciones. Arlana (Saturday, 20 October)
Make A Chunk Of Money Excel In Life (Friday, 19 October)
Start a home business boudha@abacom.com (Friday, 19 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Godefroid Chapelle (Friday, 19 October)
RAND patents Dan Devine (Friday, 19 October)
UK WEBCAM LIST Darron Callender (Thursday, 18 October)
[홍보]유학가격★폭격쎄일★누구나 갈수있는기회!도전하세요!! Youn, Roy (Thursday, 18 October)
W3C position on patents / business methods John Skelton (Thursday, 18 October)
No To The Patent Policy Joe Morris (Thursday, 18 October)
NO TO RAND (even after 11 October!) tim bacon (Thursday, 18 October)
**SPECIAL**COMPUTER MEMORY memorytogo@memorytogo4.com (Thursday, 18 October)
patent logic S. Vikram (Thursday, 18 October)
patent logic S. Vikram (Thursday, 18 October)
Make A Chunk Of Money Excel In Life (Thursday, 18 October)
Against fees Robert Hooton (Wednesday, 3 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you friendz@openxxx.net (Monday, 15 October)
XenoFORM XenoFORM team. (Wednesday, 17 October)
Make A Chunk Of Money Make Money Fast (Wednesday, 17 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft L D (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Patent Policy Framework draft Anne E. Jablinske (Tuesday, 9 October)
Software development / ref:1603 Info (Wednesday, 17 October)
advice 20 morganmarino241@yahoo.com (Wednesday, 17 October)
Standards are to be STANDARD by Definition Warren Puckett (Wednesday, 17 October)
Patent Policy for WWW Standards Troy W. (Wednesday, 17 October)
Incorruptible.com News News@incorruptible.com (Tuesday, 16 October)
�� !!! ludmila (Wednesday, 17 October)
As suggested in the GNU WEB site.. BODRATO Stefano (Tuesday, 16 October)
Patents Anders (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: Patents Antonio Arauzo (Wednesday, 17 October)
Another boring standard letter which I copied and pasted off the EFF site. Adrian Hesketh (Tuesday, 16 October)
Read your profile.......... :) Mystic Realms (Tuesday, 16 October)
Mike wanted you to read this. Jim (Tuesday, 16 October)
Patent Policy Working Group] stalbert (Monday, 15 October)
Indikator vashego uspeha!!! ludmila (Tuesday, 16 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you friendz@openxxx.net (Monday, 15 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework Eric Backus (Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Nobody (Monday, 15 October)
Make Some Money Excel In Life (Monday, 15 October)
Re: Apple comments on the W3C's proposal Simon Brooke (Monday, 15 October)
Science-based design and development Andrey Golokhvastov (Monday, 15 October)
Maximum Email Profits! David Scott (Internet Marketing Expert) (Monday, 15 October)
Anthrax... No, it's NOT a computer virus! Family Survival News (Sunday, 14 October)
Patent Policy Framework Marina Brown (Sunday, 14 October)
Earn $50,000 or more in 90 days Chriss@incorruptible.com (Sunday, 14 October)
New Patriotic American Bald Eagle Screen Saver - Free shareware version available for download - Newsletter mz John Herron - Eagle Stock Images (Sunday, 14 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx.net to you friends@openxxx.net (Sunday, 14 October)
Recent Patent Policy Framework Draft Baba Kofi Weusijana (Sunday, 14 October)
(Resend) RAND at W3C would reinforce global inequity Rick Jelliffe (Sunday, 14 October)
triggerhappytv butlerboys@cwctv.net (Sunday, 14 October)
Hello, your friend recommended openxxx to you friends@openxxx.net (Saturday, 13 October)
RAND Ivan Thomson (Saturday, 13 October)
- Re: RAND Toni Mueller (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: RAND Micheal Lewis (Tuesday, 2 October)
don't think so allen lackey (Saturday, 13 October)
- Re: don't think so Hans Schulze (Saturday, 13 October)
what a sham jeff lackey (Saturday, 13 October)
Make A Little Money Excel In Life (Saturday, 13 October)
image damage, legitimacy of w3c endangered barbapapa (Saturday, 13 October)
Patents = Web only for the RICH john-paul delaney (Saturday, 13 October)
WWW.ZELDMAN.COM Vanessa Lintner (Saturday, 13 October)
web standards should NOT be patented ! Alexander Sirotkin (Saturday, 13 October)
Your free listing @ JabbasPalace.com Jabba@JabbasPalace.com (Saturday, 13 October)
Against the new patent policy. Simon White (Friday, 12 October)
Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Daniel J. Weitzner (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Daniel Phillips (Friday, 12 October)
  - Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Daniel J. Weitzner (Sunday, 14 October)
- Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Jason Antony (Sunday, 14 October)
  - Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Daniel J. Weitzner (Sunday, 14 October)
    - Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Jason Antony (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Edoardo Dezani (Sunday, 14 October)
- Re: Next steps in W3C Patent Policy process Scott Davis (Tuesday, 16 October)
"AGAINST INSANE RAND POLICY" M Mamoun (Friday, 12 October)
The Social/Political Role of the W3C Brad Herman (Friday, 12 October)
Web standards, W3C and others. derek lane (Friday, 12 October)
Another $0.02 against. Michael Burford (GetRight) (Friday, 12 October)
THIS IS AN AWFUL IDEA LoreWeaver (Friday, 12 October)
No patents or license rights on the web! Jack Martinez (Friday, 12 October)
Patent policy comment hogarth (Friday, 12 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> John Taylor (Friday, 12 October)
www-patentpolicy-comment Randolph Vail (Friday, 12 October)
Patents and standards El-Gayar, Omar (Friday, 12 October)
RAND rdean71@cs.com (Friday, 12 October)
ACTIVADORES BIOL�GICOS PARA ELIMINAR OLORES. �PUBLICIDAD! !PUBLICIDAD� (Friday, 12 October)
I realize this is a bit late... Seairth Jacobs (Friday, 12 October)
RAND IS BAD John Dooley Road Runner (Friday, 12 October)
PC FLORIPA Inform�tica - Tudo para seu computador PC FLORIPA Inform�tica (Friday, 12 October)
Don't do it ! Jean-Yves Delort (Friday, 12 October)
Protect your life ! protect@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)
Plese, no RAND!! Marco Maggesi (Friday, 12 October)
10�� 8�� 14:00�ÿ� ��ߴٴϱ�.. ^^v top (Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)
RAND Comments August Zajonc (Friday, 12 October)
asda nepp@df.copm (Friday, 12 October)
asda nepp@df.copm (Friday, 12 October)
Opinion Dominic Ringuet (Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)
Vague definitions involve a vague future. Edward Champion (Friday, 12 October)
Opinion on Patent Policy Framework Working Draft M Birch (Friday, 12 October)
Meta4z.com Website Giveaway! will (Friday, 12 October)
Additional thoughts against RAND (long, rambling, possibly incoherent) Tony Sellers (Friday, 12 October)
Additional thoughts against RAND (short) Tony Sellers (Friday, 12 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Tim Bray (Friday, 12 October)
RF-only is much better Anant Sahai (Friday, 12 October)
Policy is self-contradictory and could sideline W3C Mark Shewmaker (Friday, 12 October)
What are you, idiots? Jorey Bump (Friday, 12 October)
RAND vs Universal Access; many other loopholes Neal McBurnett (Friday, 12 October)
I'm opposed to the "reasonable and non-discriminatory" (RAND) licensing option John White (Friday, 12 October)
Electronic Frontier Foundation comments Seth David Schoen (Friday, 12 October)
Opposition to RAND Patent Policy Amit Sahai (Friday, 12 October)
Comment on W3C's proposed (RAND) Patent Policy John L. Males (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: Comment on W3C's proposed (RAND) Patent Policy Jason Antony (Friday, 12 October)
New T-shirts screenprints with original art Forrest Bass (Friday, 12 October)
Reject the Patent Policy Framework. Brock Frazier (Friday, 12 October)
On the W3C and Openness... Joe Crawford (Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)
Attn: the W3C Jason Antony (Friday, 12 October)
SchemaSoft comments on 16 Aug 2001 W3C Patent Policy Framework Philip Mansfield (Friday, 12 October)
Protect yourself ! info@life-protect.com (Friday, 12 October)
Love of w3c vs. Devotion to free software tom@croft.tc (Thursday, 11 October)
Uselicensing in W3C standards Mike McCune (Thursday, 11 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards Paul H. Smith (Friday, 12 October)
Recall: Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Thursday, 11 October)
Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: HP's Proposal for Royalty Free W3C Standards BELL,JIM (HP-Cupertino,ex6) (Sunday, 14 October)
SoftQuad Software's comments on the patent policy Lauren Wood (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND Jon Snader (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft and RAND weston (Thursday, 11 October)
seed corn William Loughborough (Thursday, 11 October)
NO royalty on WWW Seung Hyun Kim (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent is not standard 서돈키호테 (Thursday, 11 October)
an extraordinarily bad idea Matthew Walker (Thursday, 11 October)
A Comment on the Proposed Patent Policy and the ensuing controversy (reformatted) Paul Levy (Thursday, 11 October)
XenoFORM XenoFORM team. (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Disaster Tex Horning (Thursday, 11 October)
Royalty-free patents only, please Allen Smith (Thursday, 11 October)
Apple Computer's Statement on the Draft W3C Patent Policy Wanda Cox (Thursday, 11 October)
A Comment on the Proposed Patent Policy and the ensuing controversy Paul Levy (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Gregory Catalone (Thursday, 11 October)
Oppose Patents Mark Bartlett (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND Proposals Alex Hogarth (Thursday, 11 October)
Comments Patrick Chapman (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND considered harmful rand.w3c@bernard-hugueney.org (Thursday, 11 October)
Iper1 per l'e-commerce blumoda@tiscalinet.it (Thursday, 11 October)
Meta4z.com Website Giveaway! will (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Mark Maloney (Thursday, 11 October)
Contribution to W3C consultation Charles Stewart (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Draft nucleus (Thursday, 11 October)
Future High Level Functionality Mark Johnson (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Feedback Phillip Fox (Thursday, 11 October)
Last day of comments, nothing changed Daniel Phillips (Thursday, 11 October)
PATENTS & THE WORLD WIDE WEB Jonathan Bullen (Thursday, 11 October)
NO! Ryan Guenther (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND bad, RF Good R. Steven Rainwater (Thursday, 11 October)
About the patent policy in W3C web standards Luca Saiu (Thursday, 11 October)
Proposed RAND Licensing arrangements Wally Pratt (Thursday, 11 October)
Fatal Weaknesses of the Patent Disclosure Rules: and the Unocal P atent Debacle Peter DiMauro (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Nancy Massey (Thursday, 11 October)
"RAND" policy Steve Summit (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: "RAND" policy Jason Antony (Friday, 12 October)
Request for feedback. David Woodhouse (Thursday, 11 October)
Anasil - software network analyzer Anasil (Thursday, 11 October)
Hi from Nick of 6 ,fuller ave newdynamic (Thursday, 11 October)
Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Michel Debar (Thursday, 11 October)
patent policy Tarun Ramakrishna Elankath (Thursday, 11 October)
Proposed RAND licensing arrangements Mike Brodbelt (Thursday, 11 October)
patents on the web Oz Barron (Thursday, 11 October)
Opposition to RAND Proposal Glenn Elliott (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Svein Pedersen (Thursday, 11 October)
Patented Internet standards are wrong John Hansknecht (Thursday, 11 October)
Don't drown the spirit of generosity. Rory Ewins (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: Don't drown the spirit of generosity. Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Thursday, 11 October)
Concerned about patent policy Bradley M. Kuhn (Wednesday, 10 October)
standards require RF Gemeinnutz@LuftHans.com (Thursday, 11 October)
W3C Patent Policy Claire Hitchfield (Thursday, 11 October)
What he said Stuart Robertson (Thursday, 11 October)
Setting Standards for the On-line Community Tom Worthington (Thursday, 11 October)
Listen to OSI and Mozilla Tore Ferner (Thursday, 11 October)
The Web is not just for business Chris Rimmer (Thursday, 11 October)
My objection to Patent of Internet standards Scottie \ (Thursday, 11 October)
Comments of Patent policy Marc (Thursday, 11 October)
comments Mark Ellis (Thursday, 11 October)
Cadastro 944411@yahoo.com (Thursday, 11 October)
comments on patent policy Mark Ellis (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent policy comment Alisdair Odd (Thursday, 11 October)
Freedom is essential for Innovation Ajeet P Velankar (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND Proposal Jeff Herrin (Thursday, 11 October)
Thanks Jim Conway (Thursday, 11 October)
Use of `RAND' patents D. Tweed (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND licencing proposal Michael Zajac (Thursday, 11 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft linukes@hushmail.com (Thursday, 11 October)
Standards should help education Rafael Calvo (Thursday, 11 October)
The general public will fight back Rodger L. Finnestead (Thursday, 11 October)
open, free standards rob@robnet.com (Thursday, 11 October)
RAND considered harmful Steven Pothier (Thursday, 11 October)
Objections to RAND Licensing Mode activities Steven W McDougall (Thursday, 11 October)
One little voice against Brett Merkey (Thursday, 11 October)
No to Unreasonable and Discriminatory Standards Rajendra Shrestha (Thursday, 11 October)
OFFER FOR HELP edward mambo (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: OFFER FOR HELP Diana Muir (Tuesday, 30 October)
Patent Policy Framework Comment sdrie (Thursday, 11 October)
what are you thinking???? Scott Staab (Thursday, 11 October)
patent policy Ben van 't Ende (Wednesday, 10 October)
New public W3 standards involving RAND licensing conditions. m.Lund (Wednesday, 10 October)
in doubt & uncertain J. van Gorkum (Wednesday, 10 October)
patent policy Joel T Schneider (Wednesday, 10 October)
opinion on patent policy krista gallagher (Wednesday, 10 October)
I Oppose RAND tony@nhfpl.org (Wednesday, 10 October)
"RAND" policy Don (Wednesday, 10 October)
Opera Software's postion Håkon Wium Lie (Wednesday, 10 October)
Support Open Web Standards Greg Kise (Wednesday, 10 October)
Apple's RAND licensing, prior art, and the W3C process Neil Harris (Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org ccooke@indigo.ie (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy Comment / Objecting to RAND psevetson@netscape.net (Wednesday, 10 October)
Subject: "NO" TO RAND LICENSING Bruce Lunde (Wednesday, 10 October)
Just say no Chip Mefford (Wednesday, 10 October)
Policy Valden Longhurst (Wednesday, 10 October)
- Re: Policy Dunn_Bill@emc.com (Wednesday, 10 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Roozbeh Pournader (Wednesday, 10 October)
Keep the web open and alive Dr. Michael Evans (Wednesday, 10 October)
WWW Patent Policy makes same mistake as dead dot-coms Joseph Wang (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent policy Richard Walker (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patents = Friction John Medcalf (Wednesday, 10 October)
RAND direction proposal Alexander Stohr (Wednesday, 10 October)
petition dpytlewski@idea.net.pl (Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on draft Patent Policy Framework Joycelyn Maddux (Wednesday, 10 October)
Proposed patent policy Greg Ward (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy comment Jason L. Gohlke (Wednesday, 10 October)
Suggestions for alternative procedure David Balch (Wednesday, 10 October)
RAND: A Bad Thing Peter H. (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patents rick@dimensionsinteractive.com (Wednesday, 10 October)
Don't put your hands in my pourse !!! Nazar (Wednesday, 10 October)
Branded/Private Label Realtime Internet Travel Booking Engine in Eleven Languages John Hazlewood (Wednesday, 10 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Ben Wrighton - Wapdesign (Wednesday, 10 October)
open source is open mind Trahojen (Wednesday, 10 October)
Risks to content (digital rights management) in proposed framework Andy Oram (Wednesday, 10 October)
Doing a PhD? Mark Coppel (Wednesday, 10 October)
Applause Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy Mark Plowman (Wednesday, 10 October)
500 billion not enough for MS? Jsphrsa@aol.com (Wednesday, 10 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Jens Laland (Wednesday, 10 October)
This is not a good idea Lars Nielsen Lind (Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on the proposal Paul Pathiakis (Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on the proposal James Green (Wednesday, 10 October)
No to RAND David Wright (Wednesday, 10 October)
My disquiet at RAND licenses Rajnish Bhaskar (Wednesday, 10 October)
wealthocracy corrupting meritocracy - funding strategy proposal Tom Cowap (Wednesday, 10 October)
Request to extend public comment period Jason Antony (Wednesday, 10 October)
Re: Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Jozef Halbersztadt (Wednesday, 10 October)
Request to extend public comment period Jason Antony (Wednesday, 10 October)
New Friends From Bermuda!? Bermuda Seek (Wednesday, 10 October)
I reject a proprietary W3C pressio main (Wednesday, 10 October)
Since when is the web for sale? Bea Fontaine (Wednesday, 10 October)
Response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Policy Draft Robin Peters (Wednesday, 10 October)
Exclusion Frank Schafer (Wednesday, 10 October)
patent policy framework draft Austin Brooks (Wednesday, 10 October)
patented protocols. Michael Mounteney (Wednesday, 10 October)
I am disappointed Martin Kutschker (Wednesday, 10 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework michael (Wednesday, 10 October)
Web Standards NLK (Tuesday, 9 October)
Regarding recent Patent Policy Framework draft Daniel LaBell (Wednesday, 10 October)
www Power Grab Donald Kleyensteuber (Wednesday, 10 October)
No RAND in Patent Policy Framework Draft Scott Busby (Wednesday, 10 October)
Keep the WWW a free zone Philip and Shelia McArdle (Wednesday, 10 October)
Say It Ain't So, Joe Patricia West (Wednesday, 10 October)
No to RAND licensing Carl Douglas (Wednesday, 10 October)
Comments on RAND in three sections Steven Healey (Wednesday, 10 October)
Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Christopher Blizzard (Wednesday, 10 October)
- Re: Mozilla.org response to the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Lee T S (Thursday, 11 October)
Looking for Mortgage Leads??? -racbflg thunderbird@jufuceyj.yahoo.com (Thursday, 11 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Roberto Schulz (Wednesday, 10 October)
- Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] Alek Lynge (Wednesday, 10 October)
Additional comments to W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Evelio Perez-Albuerne (Wednesday, 10 October)
About Your Resource webmaster@axxxhome.com (Wednesday, 10 October)
Nothing to say but "no" Jose Luis Pumarega (Wednesday, 10 October)
SEXWEB NO.1 .. MEGAWEB-SEX ! EROTICAWWW (Tuesday, 9 October)
Reasons not to accept patents into standards Matthew Boulos (Tuesday, 9 October)
Comments on Patent Policy Draft matthew@toseland.f9.co.uk (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND licensing should not be allowed Nathaniel Gray (Tuesday, 9 October)
Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees Jeffrey Zeldman (Tuesday, 9 October)
- Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees Daniel Phillips (Tuesday, 9 October)
  - Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees Jason Antony (Wednesday, 10 October)
  - Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees Steven Champeon (Wednesday, 10 October)
- Re: Policy requires definitions, remedies, guarantees Jason Antony (Wednesday, 10 October)
so...how much is Microsoft paying you? Robin Shaw (Tuesday, 9 October)
Web Patents Davi (Tuesday, 9 October)
Established Standards Eldon King (Tuesday, 9 October)
FW: RAND licensing proposal. Doug Dingus (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND Robert Bergesch (Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> jose lorenzo (Tuesday, 9 October)
Clear Consequences Matthew C. Tedder (Wednesday, 10 October)
Publicity For Less - (Specialty Media Lists Available) PublicityWorks@netscape.net (Tuesday, 9 October)
patent-response Edward Renaud (Tuesday, 9 October)
Stay Open Paul Tichonczuk (Tuesday, 9 October)
Bookstore & Library Databases (400+ New Libraries; 175 New Age Bookstores) PublicityWorks@netscape.net (Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy draft. John Hornstein (Tuesday, 9 October)
There Was Once a Vision of a Free Internet Mark Herman II (Tuesday, 9 October)
I object!! Gayle Knutson (Tuesday, 9 October)
Royalty-free (RF) is the only acceptable 'compromise' Ralph Hyre (Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy Gerard Boissy (Tuesday, 9 October)
KIO Raymond Pirouz (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND objection Bryan Montford (Tuesday, 9 October)
no patents please Loe, Steven (Tuesday, 9 October)
OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy Eric S. Raymond (Tuesday, 9 October)
- Re: OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy Maurice Aubrey (Tuesday, 9 October)
- Re: OSI letter of comment on W3C's proposed RAND policy TopXML - Mark Wilson (Wednesday, 10 October)
RAND objection Mark Brader (Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Timothy Hinds (Tuesday, 9 October)
In Response To Proposed Patent Policy cbma (Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Jim Webb (Tuesday, 9 October)
Anti-Trust Issues of RAND Daniel Probst (Tuesday, 9 October)
Disappointed Steven.H.Rogers@seagate.com (Tuesday, 9 October)
RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 9 October)
- Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 9 October)
  - Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 9 October)
    - No to RAND as it is proposed Marc Verwerft (Tuesday, 9 October)
  - Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Tuesday, 9 October)
  - Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Jonathan Borden (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Wednesday, 10 October)
--- dont quite understand this eddie wilson (Tuesday, 9 October)
No, no no Cory Shubert (Tuesday, 9 October)
W3C Patent Policy Jon Slaton (Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Kai Kunze (Tuesday, 9 October)
W3C standards should be free Asle Benoni (Tuesday, 9 October)
A Case for Freedom massey (Tuesday, 9 October)
My thoughts on the Patency Policy draft Glen Scott (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND licensing is bad Ted Wright (Tuesday, 9 October)
Please fax two copies of your promotional literature to 08717171250. phone.08717171249@fax.08717171250 (Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Madden, Francis (Tuesday, 9 October)
Thoughts on your Patent proposal Henrik Jönsson (Tuesday, 9 October)
World Wide Web Consortium - Patent Policy Working Group wendybrek@mixcom.com (Tuesday, 9 October)
Human evolution. Manos Batsis (Tuesday, 9 October)
A query about RF Jason Antony (Tuesday, 9 October)
- Re: A query about RF Chris Lilley (Wednesday, 10 October)
  - Re: A query about RF Jason Antony (Friday, 12 October)
    - Re: A query about RF Chris Lilley (Friday, 12 October)
A few more comments (this time on the specific wording of the "W3C Patent Policy Framework") Jesper Juhl (Tuesday, 9 October)
www-patentpolicy-comment James (Monday, 8 October)
Comment Voluspa (Tuesday, 9 October)
Define RAND Pat Mahoney (Tuesday, 9 October)
Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Bill Zaumen (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND: sounds like end of free web software, originator of WWW & W3C Danilo Almeida (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND cfb@sol.usc.edu (Tuesday, 9 October)
If you feel fees must be charged, could a "sliding" scale be used steve and allana (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND Licensing is Counterproductive Bill Gunn (Tuesday, 9 October)
Supporting software patents undermines credibility of W3C Dwayne C. Litzenberger (Tuesday, 9 October)
Proposed Patent Royalty Policy for WWW Bobgmoss@aol.com (Tuesday, 9 October)
RAND and Rolalty-Free Licensing Mode James Gartside (Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy comments Bob McDonald (Tuesday, 9 October)
Not a good idea Dan Phiffer (Tuesday, 9 October)
Patent Policy gregory.d.dickson@accenture.com (Monday, 8 October)
oppose abuse of patent system to limit web free flow of information paul ih (Tuesday, 9 October)
Comments on patent Policy Cathy Gage (Tuesday, 9 October)
No Patents LMichelle (Tuesday, 9 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Oscar Zurita (Wednesday, 17 October)
Essential Claim question Noble, Lisa (Monday, 8 October)
Comments Jon Wiley (Monday, 8 October)
Open Web! John Abbe (Monday, 8 October)
comments on proposals Lisa Lorenzin (Monday, 8 October)
Eurolinux statement on W3C RAND proposal Stefane Fermigier (Monday, 8 October)
RAND licensing John Carey (Monday, 8 October)
New forums/massage-board. Please join now! this-is-the-shit (Monday, 8 October)
New forums/massage-board. Please join now! this-is-the-shit (Monday, 8 October)
please don't Joe Desbonnet (Monday, 8 October)
patent policy Daniel Webb (Monday, 8 October)
Patents are damage Steven W McDougall (Monday, 8 October)
Royalties Mariner's Loft (Monday, 8 October)
Disagreement with new Patent Policy draft Paul Erickson (Monday, 8 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework working draft Bob Goates (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Framework Rob Simmons (Monday, 8 October)
DON"T RECOMEND RAND Kyle Cranmer (Monday, 8 October)
the W3C has a virus Robert Stockmann (Monday, 8 October)
Bad Idea mplemmons@ee.net (Monday, 8 October)
Disagree with RAND license Arnaud Vaneste (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy draft Massimo, Tiziana e Federica (Monday, 8 October)
say NO to RAND licensing N.Oden (Monday, 8 October)
Please do not stop innovation in its' tracks Mason Miller (Monday, 8 October)
policy ht (Monday, 8 October)
Do not cater to the large corporations Carolyn Hillman (Monday, 8 October)
Sorry to see this happening Roman (Monday, 8 October)
"Non-discriminatory" commercial licenses impossible Adrian Tymes (Monday, 8 October)
Patented standards are not standards. chris.gamble@CPBINC.com (Monday, 8 October)
RAND is a bad Idea Karl Doblinger (Monday, 8 October)
Please Rethink Your Policy Hythian (Monday, 8 October)
Free Software compatibility Dmitry Borodaenko (Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Douglas Holt (Monday, 8 October)
The RAND proposed in the Patent Policy Framework Yves Savourel (Monday, 8 October)
RAND Patent Policy - Against davis (Monday, 8 October)
No thanks Morten �rsted, [MOCH] (Monday, 8 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org (Monday, 8 October)
WaSP to W3C: Remember Your Mission Steven Champeon (Monday, 8 October)
RAND Ryan Rajpaul (Monday, 8 October)
Comment BEN BARRAZA (Monday, 8 October)
If you love them, then run to them. nopatents@onmyweb.com (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Dhruva Reddy (Monday, 8 October)
Comments to "In support of EFF's call for a royalty-free licensing model" Martin Olsson (Monday, 8 October)
Why RAND will kill the W3C Mark Mumford (Monday, 8 October)
wc3 Lorntz (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Comment Andrew Meredith (Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> CoyoteinCA@netscape.net (Monday, 8 October)
Draft proposal allowing Patents in W3C standards Josh Fryman (Monday, 8 October)
Six issues arle lommel (Monday, 8 October)
- Re: Six issues Jim Sansing (Monday, 8 October)
Don't do it. Bill Evans (Monday, 8 October)
PATENTS John Seago (Monday, 8 October)
Keep the Web (Royalty) Free Mark Anderson*INTERACTIVE* (Monday, 8 October)
Objection to RAND Stuart Gaunt (Monday, 8 October)
The Patent Policy Framework Diego Lunetta (Monday, 8 October)
in support of patent-free standards Tom Garcia (Monday, 8 October)
w3c RAND licence laurent (Monday, 8 October)
The W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft is totally unacceptable Toby Perkins (Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Thomas Longuemart (Monday, 8 October)
Don't do it! Ostergaard, AJ (Monday, 8 October)
In support of EFF's call for a royalty-free licensing model Peter Magnusson (Monday, 8 October)
well.. Gilbert Fernandes (Monday, 8 October)
Stop Michael Wood (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Working Group Ricardo Campos (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft John Billings (Monday, 8 October)
common sense valko yotov (Monday, 8 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Michael Clarke (Monday, 8 October)
RAND will either kill W3C or the internet David Jander (Monday, 8 October)
RAND Policy Will Destroy The Internet Aaron Swenson (Monday, 8 October)
Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND ->DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) chuck weinberger (Monday, 8 October)
bad idea bwg (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy on web standards - my concerns simeon.morgan@ideas.com.au (Monday, 8 October)
Patent policy is madness Ignacio Torres Masdeu (Monday, 8 October)
Vote no on rolaties bink (Monday, 8 October)
comments Alice Corbin (Monday, 8 October)
patents: whaddyew, crazy? Ray Gulick (Monday, 8 October)
Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory ? La Place (Monday, 8 October)
RAND J (Monday, 8 October)
Free money Making Website ! Costs Of Address raserat2001@yahoo.com (Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft The Rev. Tony Begonja (Sunday, 7 October)
Comment on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Stuart Ambler (Sunday, 7 October)
No RAND licensing Alan Chiu (Monday, 8 October)
RAND & W3C Standards Paul Dundas (Monday, 8 October)
- Re: RAND & W3C Standards Daniel Phillips (Monday, 8 October)
Stupid Ukiah Smith (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Matthew Arieta (Monday, 8 October)
Patent Policy Eric Johnson (Sunday, 7 October)
another NO vote for RAND licensing paulc@best.com (Sunday, 7 October)
Cease & Desist C. B. Yarling (Sunday, 7 October)
Scenarios related to PPG Proposal derek lane (Sunday, 7 October)
"NO" TO RAND LICENSING Mike Leary (Sunday, 7 October)
Re: New list - www-patentpolicy-comment - maintained by djweitzner@w3.org Linda Morris (Sunday, 7 October)
patent policy michael d. henry (Sunday, 7 October)
WWW Patent Policy Narada Hess (Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Meg Otto (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND Tor Perkins (Sunday, 7 October)
Say NO to RAND licensing David Mosher (Sunday, 7 October)
Comments Al Johnson (Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Framework Thomas H. Mitchell, C.P.A. (Sunday, 7 October)
public comment Charles Geyer (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND patent licensing Phil Quinn (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND patent licensing Fred Condo (Sunday, 7 October)
Effect of public outrage?[was Re: SVG] William Loughborough (Sunday, 7 October)
Patent licensing decision Kevin (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: Patent licensing decision Bob Hayes (Sunday, 7 October)
W3C patent policy Richard (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: W3C patent policy Dylan Thurston (Wednesday, 3 October)
  - Something that scares me Jason Antony (Thursday, 4 October)
Why Kenneth R Westerback (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND Dan Howard (Sunday, 7 October)
Patents don't belong on the WWW David Smith (Sunday, 7 October)
plea against RAND patents in W3C standards Bjoern Kriews (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND / Patent: NO ! Juergen Sauer (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND licensing and Free Software Alexandre Dulaunoy (Sunday, 7 October)
Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) Claude Zervas (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND ->DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) Chris Lilley (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it) Daniel Phillips (Sunday, 7 October)
sack members John Priestley (Saturday, 6 October)
Free money Making Website ! Get One Before They R Gone I Got Mine raserat2001@yahoo.com (Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> RM (Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Clifford Satlow (Sunday, 7 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Janette Seidel (Sunday, 7 October)
Three substantial comments dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp (Sunday, 7 October)
dangerous proposal Peter Lin (Tuesday, 2 October)
W3C Patent Policy Russ Howard (Tuesday, 2 October)
Re: RF > RAMMED ... sorry, I screwed up a link... Chris Worley (Tuesday, 2 October)
No Subject dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp (Sunday, 7 October)
Patents restrict progress Michael Rowehl (Sunday, 7 October)
Three substantial comments dr_lenz@ziplip.co.jp (Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy - Setting the bar on "where it is not possible" Steven Weinstein (Sunday, 7 October)
RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C TopXML - Mark Wilson (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C Adam Warner (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C Adam Warner (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: RAND is not bad, but we're concerned about the W3C TopXML - Mark Wilson (Sunday, 7 October)
Don't allow standards based on RAND Licenses B.J. Herbison (Sunday, 7 October)
H.E.L.L.N.O. to R.A.N.D! Mike Amundsen (Saturday, 6 October)
Revised patent policy proposal Ippolito, Mark E. (Saturday, 6 October)
Against the RAND initiative Stephen Wynne (Saturday, 6 October)
No to RAND Sumanth Sukumar (Saturday, 6 October)
Against the Patent Policy Pedro Gil (Saturday, 6 October)
Well, its been fun... Claude Zervas (Saturday, 6 October)
RAND Eric Jacobsen (Saturday, 6 October)
License fees Ekkard Schnedermann (Saturday, 6 October)
Patents Svend Ezaki Tofte (Saturday, 6 October)
what are you doing?! josh penrod (Saturday, 6 October)
Enough about RAND Ray van der Woning (Saturday, 6 October)
Royalty Free YES, rand NO Tyler R Holcomb (Saturday, 6 October)
Rand Policy A.J. Madu (Saturday, 6 October)
W3C Patent Policy Peter Goode (Saturday, 6 October)
I vote for free standards Jussi Hirvi (Saturday, 6 October)
Response to Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft José Luis Otermin (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: Response to Public Comments on the W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Mike Todd (Wednesday, 10 October)
w3c: patent (entrance barrier) R. Ivan Linderman $best$ (Saturday, 6 October)
Breaking off Afonso Fernandez Nogueira (Saturday, 6 October)
patent concern Willis, Kevin J (Saturday, 6 October)
DON'T Orsted [Achtung] (Saturday, 6 October)
Allowing Patents on W3C standards will make the w3c redundant Christian Schaller (Saturday, 6 October)
You need to rethink your preposal about patented tech. Martin Veise (Saturday, 6 October)
Please don't shackle the web Khuzaima A. Lakdawala (Saturday, 6 October)
Patents Gregory Carter (Thursday, 4 October)
Concerned about the Patent Policy Peter Hanappe (Saturday, 6 October)
RAND (no kidding :) Lance Levsen (Saturday, 6 October)
Comment on The Patenting Info Keith Vick (Saturday, 6 October)
Why the sudden change of mind from W3C? David List (Saturday, 6 October)
RAND licensing = Bad Idea whj whj (Saturday, 6 October)
www-patentpolicy-comment Joris Van den Bergh (Saturday, 6 October)
Patent Policy Framework Draft Mark Koscak (Saturday, 6 October)
another vote against implementing RAND licensing procedures CPausheek@aol.com (Saturday, 6 October)
abuse of patents should not extend into standards realm John McMahon (Saturday, 6 October)
Conern of the term "reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty fees" Paul H. Smith (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: Conern of the term "reasonable and non-discriminatory royalty fees" chuck weinberger (Saturday, 6 October)
comments about Patent Policy Framework draft Jason Brown (Saturday, 6 October)
Patent policy comments Terry Griffin (Saturday, 6 October)
I believe the W3C should not endorse Patented Technologies Shlomi Fish (Saturday, 6 October)
Crazy nam nguyen quoc (Saturday, 6 October)
Advice from a Modem War Survivor chuck weinberger (Saturday, 6 October)
Wrong thing going RAND Ky Vinh (Saturday, 6 October)
proposed W3C patent policy Dave_Touretzky@cs.cmu.edu (Saturday, 6 October)
Concerning Patents rdibble@dibble.net (Saturday, 6 October)
LiveJournal Opposes RAND Mark Kraft (Saturday, 6 October)
w3.org renamed to w3.com and retired tokiko (Saturday, 6 October)
OT: IETF [was: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>] Jason Antony (Saturday, 6 October)
AGAINST RAND policy 3L@xwinds.com (Saturday, 6 October)
W3C Policy Breakdown Sean B. Palmer (Saturday, 6 October)
Rand licensing Barbara Pratt (Saturday, 6 October)
Patent Policy Working Group Curtis Hawthorne (Saturday, 6 October)
RAND licencing would lead to incompatibility problems Arto Teräs (Saturday, 6 October)
- RAND licencing will re-define meaning of "standard" Risto Jokinen (Saturday, 6 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Greg Doran (Saturday, 6 October)
- RE: W3C Patent Policy Framework Working Draft Andy Chase (Tuesday, 2 October)
Turning the W3 into an impenetrable oligarchy kjensen (Friday, 5 October)
Against RAND from Singapore Seamus Phan (Friday, 5 October)
Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (Friday, 5 October)
Introduction of patents? God forbid! vivek achary (Friday, 5 October)
RAND licensing Miaoling Chiu (Friday, 5 October)
Regarding the use of patented technologies in standards Paul Lee (Wednesday, 3 October)
patents and the 3w Richard Lyons (Friday, 5 October)
Allowing patented software into standards Brian Clancey (Wednesday, 3 October)
Strongly disapprove David Collier-Brown (Thursday, 4 October)
Changename: W3C to P3C Joe Doran (Friday, 5 October)
NO Jerry Wood (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Changes would cause problems - but not insurmountable ones. Peter Street (Friday, 5 October)
No to patents Wanderley Ceschim (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Mike Dewey (Friday, 5 October)
No RAND Jim Edwards (Friday, 5 October)
Patents Alan Woodland (Friday, 5 October)
Formal Comment on W3C Patent Policy Framework, Working Draft 16 Stephen Satchell (Friday, 5 October)
RAND policy et. al. Douglas Stillinger (Friday, 5 October)
royalty-free web standards Jim Phillips (Friday, 5 October)
open standards nicholas paredes (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft jduell@alumni.princeton.edu (Friday, 5 October)
Patent policy Sascha Brawer (Friday, 5 October)
Objection to the RAND licensing option in the proposed policy. Fred Sturman (Friday, 5 October)
RAND "standards" Mark W. Alexander (Friday, 5 October)
The proposed change Gerald Albitre (Friday, 5 October)
response to RAND Patent proposal Mann, Lydia (Friday, 5 October)
Fees for web standard products Ron Bogas (Friday, 5 October)
Following the Money Trail / Going Backwards on Democracy Frank Grave de Peralta (Friday, 5 October)
RF vs. RAND Mark Christensen (Friday, 5 October)
RAND licensing option is not sensible Louis C. Gasper, Ph.D., KHS (Friday, 5 October)
W3C patent policy Christoph Weber (Friday, 5 October)
patent policy comments Ilya Haykinson (Friday, 5 October)
The open-source community demands the immediate withdrawal of the proposal for a new W3C Patent Policy !!!! TISCALI (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Jon Osborn (Friday, 5 October)
patents in W3C standards chtodd@core.com (Friday, 5 October)
PersonalDB.net 회원으로 초대받으셨습니다. 관리자 (Friday, 5 October)
comments on patent policy Terrell Mitchell (Friday, 5 October)
Feedback on the Patent Policy Framework draft Ulrich Berens (Friday, 5 October)
Patents will undermine useability Charlie Brooks (Friday, 5 October)
discriminatory patents Michiel Ettema (Friday, 5 October)
What is reasonable? Eric Richardson (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policies Karl Lehenbauer (Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy Framework Ricardo Signes (Friday, 5 October)
royalties for web standards? no ! Brian Carroll (Friday, 5 October)
After all your hard work? Alison Lister (Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Millsap, Michael G. (Friday, 5 October)
We have to ACT acborges@netcabo.pt (Friday, 5 October)
Part II: A Concrete Alternative Steve Waldman (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative Glenn Randers-Pehrson (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative Simon Brooke (Friday, 5 October)
  - Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative Daniel Phillips (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative Jozef Halbersztadt (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative Carol Bean (Sunday, 7 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Gordon Osse (Friday, 5 October)
Will The W3C Destroy The Web? Bill Major (Friday, 5 October)
Part I: General Comments Steve Waldman (Friday, 5 October)
Licensing fees for implementation of standards Max Rible (Friday, 5 October)
Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy Luigi P. Bai (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy Dunn_Bill@emc.com (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy Daniel Phillips (Friday, 5 October)
  - Re: Opinion in opposition to RAND provisions of Patent Policy Luigi P. Bai (Friday, 5 October)
Thanks but no thanks. Brian Carpenter (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Feedback William E. \ (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy MIKE TAYLOR (Friday, 5 October)
Support for Open-Source Stephen C. Scherer (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Support for Open-Source Dunn_Bill@emc.com (Friday, 5 October)
A logical appeal to retain RF standards for Web sysadmin@pinjax.com (Friday, 5 October)
patents Court Demas (Friday, 5 October)
Proposed RAND Patent Policy Jeb Potterfield (Friday, 5 October)
Don't add RAND licensing to the W3C process Brent J. Nordquist (Friday, 5 October)
proposed standards jacques@panix.com (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Licensing David Walker (Friday, 5 October)
w3c proposal on patents Eric Montgomery (Friday, 5 October)
RAND will fragment the web Case, Scott (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: RAND will fragment the web Jason Antony (Saturday, 6 October)
Patent Policy Framework Louis Calitz (Friday, 5 October)
somethin smell fishy Ken Forbes (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Is A Bad Idea Duane Robertson (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework Tommy Marcus McGuire (Friday, 5 October)
Proposal for modification to Member Patent Licensing Commitments. David Woodhouse (Friday, 5 October)
web-patent policy comments Tyler Morrison (Friday, 5 October)
"NO" on RAND patent policy Kenn Louis (Friday, 5 October)
Do not let w3c become a tool for big corporations Victor Bogado da Silva Lins (Friday, 5 October)
Why a RAND? W3 & Microsoft/IE -- J. Payne (Friday, 5 October)
Royalties are discriminatory. David Andrew Michael Noelle (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Shawn Wall (Friday, 5 October)
my opinion on the subject (Web Technology Patent Area) Pieter Reint Siegers Kort (Friday, 5 October)
No to patents in W3C standards. Russell McOrmond (Friday, 5 October)
Proposed Patent Policy John Panzer (Friday, 5 October)
please rethink your policies regarding patents and RAND, simon (Friday, 5 October)
Objection to RAND Licensing Lori Dupuy (Friday, 5 October)
NO NO NO! Daisy Williams (Wednesday, 3 October)
Objection to RAND Licensing Paul Dupuy, Jr. (Friday, 5 October)
my comments on the Patent Policy for WWW Standards Dieter Van Uytvanck (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Licensing Option Lee R Boynton (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy for WWW Standards John Gisclon (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Policy for web standards Richard Coleman (Friday, 5 October)
RAND implies more changes Lucio Tato (Friday, 5 October)
What to do about the W3C? Dave Winer (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Ted Bergeron (Friday, 5 October)
Science != Bussiness Gustavo Carvalho Homem (Friday, 5 October)
The argument against patented protocols is not ideological, it is pragmatic Russell Sears (Friday, 5 October)
Support only patent-free technology Allan Oepping (Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Ing. Alejandro V�zquez C. (Friday, 5 October)
Comments on Patent Policy dat23 (Friday, 5 October)
Don't change now. Effie Kolbeins (Friday, 5 October)
Comments on Patent Policy Framework draft Alex Bischoff (Friday, 5 October)
STRONG OBJECTION TO the inclusion of RAND Dr. Mahesh S. Raisinghani (Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy: Bad for the W3C, bad for business, bad for users Sudhir Gandotra (Friday, 5 October)
Don't mix standards with patents Nigel Stewart (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Framework draft Gordon Fischer (Friday, 5 October)
RAND will be disastrous for the web Steven Jarvis (Friday, 5 October)
Standard + RAND = Monopoly Ron Schofield (Friday, 5 October)
Comments on patent policy Leonard Heyman (Friday, 5 October)
SVG ad inf. F J Franklin (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: SVG ad inf. Chris Lilley (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: SVG ad inf. F J Franklin (Saturday, 6 October)
  - Re: SVG ad inf. Daniel Phillips (Saturday, 6 October)
    - Re: SVG ad inf. F J Franklin (Saturday, 6 October)
    - Re: SVG ad inf. Daniel Phillips (Saturday, 6 October)
    - Re: SVG ad inf. Chris Lilley (Saturday, 6 October)
- Re: SVG ad inf. Theo de Raadt (Sunday, 7 October)
  - Tim Berners-Lee [was: SVG ad inf.] Jason Antony (Sunday, 7 October)
    - Re: Tim Berners-Lee [was: SVG ad inf.] Adam Warner (Sunday, 7 October)
comment on your patent policy framework draft ozan s. yigit (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Edward Terry (Friday, 5 October)
Do you listen to the people? Jenny Ashman (Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> dean blackketter (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Susan Margulies (Friday, 5 October)
Vote agains the "RAND" policy. Daniel G. Linder (Friday, 5 October)
no to RAND licensing XvDebbyvX@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Alex Morales (Friday, 5 October)
Re: IBM's comment on w3c patent policy ZilF@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)
RAND vs RF patents James Hebdon (Friday, 5 October)
Patents or Standards - Choose One. J. Mark Turner (Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Atabey Kaygun (Friday, 5 October)
[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Benjamin Edwards (Friday, 5 October)
Selling out to special interests on Patent Policy Benjamin Watkins (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policies... Brian Powell (Saturday, 6 October)
RAND = BAD idea Darren Blaser (Friday, 5 October)
RAND is incompatible with free/opensource implementations Filipe Santos (Friday, 5 October)
No to patents Charles McPhate (Friday, 5 October)
say no to RAND licensing Chad K. Bisk (Friday, 5 October)
You're digging your own grave with this... Jeppe Cramon (Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy/RAND Licensing Agreement BlakGard@aol.com (Friday, 5 October)
RAND RFPC 1 1 (Friday, 5 October)
open standards are the best way to encourage innovation and interoperability Tim Edwards (Friday, 5 October)
Additional sources of commentary that I believe the W3C should know about Jesper Juhl (Friday, 5 October)
Just say no larfx@ticnet.com (Friday, 5 October)
RAND Phil Reardon (Friday, 5 October)
Patent Policy Ronny Krashinsky (Friday, 5 October)
Comments on W3C patent policy Paul Schreiber (Friday, 5 October)
W3C Patent Policy Joe Glenn (Friday, 5 October)
May you please consider revising your draft?

www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from October 2001 by thread