W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org > October 2001

Patent policy comments

From: Terry Griffin <griffint@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 21:27:27 -0700
To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Message-Id: <01100521272700.31455@chinook>
With respect to the three components of the proposal:

1. On disclosure: No objection.

2. On royalty-free licensing: No objection.

3. On RAND licensing: Strong objection on the grounds that it discriminates 
against open source software (OSS) implementations of the standard. Most OSS 
projects are non-profit operations and have no revenue stream to support 
royalty payments no matter how "reasonable" and "non-discriminatory" the 
terms. Any royalty requirements make a standard discriminatory as far as OSS 
is concerned. Further, I think the use of RAND would inhibit technical 
improvement of the web. The Internet and OSS feed on each other. Most of the 
Internet operates on OSS and the Internet makes the collaborative efforts 
behind OSS possible. The RAND proposal threatens to break that cycle with 
respect the web, thus stalling the advancement of both the web and of open 
source software. In the event that the RAND proposal is adopted I believe it 
is inevitable that the OSS community will fork the web in order to continue 
the rapid pace of development of both the web and the software than runs it.

Terry Griffin
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2001 00:27:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:44 UTC