From: Michael Hucka <mhucka@caltech.edu>

Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:27:27 -0700

Message-ID: <16545.24927.104353.21983@dhcp-227.cds.caltech.edu>

To: www-math@w3.org

Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:27:27 -0700

Message-ID: <16545.24927.104353.21983@dhcp-227.cds.caltech.edu>

To: www-math@w3.org

Hello, We have been using MathML in our own work on SBML (Systems Biology Markup Language; http://sbml.org) and recently discovered the following discrepancy. The MathML 2.0 2nd ed. recommendation document at http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-MathML2-20031021/ describes 'e-notation' in Section 4.3.2.9. However, the XML Schema for MathML 2.0 given at http://www.w3.org/Math/XMLSchema/ does not appear to define e-notation at all. In fact, the string 'e-notation' does not appear anywhere within those files. Is this an error in the XML Schema, or has there been a change to the definition of MathML 2.0? I've looked in the MathML 2.0 errata and searched the archives for this mailing list (www-math) but haven't been able to find anything on this topic. I'd appreciate some guidance from the MathML experts among you. MH -- Mike Hucka, Ph.D. mhucka@caltech.edu Control and Dynamical Systems, MC 107-81 tel: +1.626.395.6911 Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA fax: +1.702.554.3067Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 19:49:23 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:56 GMT
*